Npm I: The Great Dependency Flood

Content RECURSION IS WHAT YOU DO WHEN USING RECURSION BUT WHAT IS RECURSION? RECURSION IS WHAT YOU DO WHEN USING RECURSION BUT WIF IS RECURSION RECURSION IS WHAT YOU DO WHEN USING RECURSION imofhip.com

Content My team's intern just found a critical bug by shitposting in our codebase So our summer intern (who I'm 90 sure is a professional shitposter moonlighting as a dev) just saved our entire authentication service by being, well, an absolute agent of chaos. Background: We have this legacy auth system that's been running since before TikTok existed. No one touches it. It's documented in ancient Sanskrit and COBOL comments. The last guy who understood it fully left to become a yoga instructor in Peru. Enter our intern. First week, he asks why our commit messages are so boring. Starts adding memes to his. Whatever, right? Then he begins leaving comments in the codebase like: This function is older than me and probably pays taxes TODO: Ask if this while loop has health insurance Here lies Sarah's hopes and dreams (2019-2022), killed by this recursive call The senior devs were split between horrified and amused. But here's where it gets good. He's reading through the auth code (because "the commit messages here are too normal, sus") and adds this gem: yo why this token validation looking kinda thicc though fr fr no cap this base64 decode bussin wait... hold up... this ain't bussin at all Turns out his Gen Z spider-sense wasn't just tingling for the memes. Man actually found a validation bypass that's been lurking in our code since Obama's first term. The kind of bug that makes security auditors wake up in cold sweats. The best part? His Jira ticket title: "Auth be acting mad sus rn no cap frfr (Critical Security Issue)" The worst part? We now have to explain to the CEO why "no cap frfr" appears in our Q3 security audit report. The absolute kicker? Our senior security engineer's official code review comment: "bestie... you snapped with this find ng" I can't tell if this is the peak or rock bottom of our engineering culture. But I do know our intern's getting a return offer, if only because I need to see what he'll do to our GraphQL documentation.

DARLING, SWEETIE, HONEY CHILD! 💅 You haven't lived until you've inherited code where some ABSOLUTE PSYCHOPATH decided that variable declarations should be wrapped in try-catch blocks! Like, what kind of trauma led to this?! Are they expecting the variable to PHYSICALLY ASSAULT them during initialization?! "Oh no, my string might throw an exception when I declare it!" PLEASE! This is the coding equivalent of wearing a helmet to eat soup! I CAN'T EVEN! 🙄

The evolution of a developer's naming conventions is a journey of madness. First, we start with the basic Sample.json - clean, simple, forgettable. Then we graduate to Customer_Request_Sample.json when we briefly remember documentation matters. But the final form? json.json - the naming equivalent of giving up completely while somehow making it worse. It's that special moment when you've stared at your code for so long that your brain has completely JSON-ified and you've lost all ability to create meaningful identifiers. The file extension IS the filename now. Checkmate, future me who needs to find this file!

The eternal struggle of every programmer: forgetting operator precedence and wondering why your code is behaving like it's possessed by demons. The top panel shows the panic when you can't remember if multiplication happens before addition or if those parentheses were actually necessary. Meanwhile, the bottom panel shows the universal solution - just wrap EVERYTHING in parentheses! Sure, your code looks like it's giving you a hug, but at least it works exactly as intended. Your future self might judge you for those 17 nested parentheses, but hey, that's a problem for future you.

Content Web development See more John t AdemoveJohn Which do you prefer: frontend or backend??? Is this how computer guys talk about ass n'titties? made with mematic ProarammerHumor.io