JavaScript Be Making You Rich

The bell curve of code readability across developer experience levels is too real! Junior devs write simple, readable code because they're still learning fundamentals. Senior devs write elegant, maintainable code because they've been burned enough times by complexity. But those mid-level devs? They've discovered just enough functional programming and regex to turn everything into incomprehensible one-liners that fit in a tweet but take 3 hours to debug. It's that dangerous middle zone where you know enough to be clever but not enough to realize why you shouldn't be.

SWEET MERCIFUL HEAVENS! The absolute TRAUMA of waking up from the most beautiful dream where coding and technology didn't exist! For one blissful moment, you thought you'd escaped the hellscape of JavaScript callbacks, React component lifecycles, and the eternal damnation of debugging! But NOPE! You're just a primitive primate destined to hunt for semicolons instead of ants. The sheer AUDACITY of your brain to make you think you could escape the programming matrix! Return to monke - it's genuinely the better option at this point! 🐒

When the senior dev asks you to explain your code to a non-technical stakeholder, and suddenly you realize you don't actually understand what you built either. That moment when your elaborate JavaScript framework is just a glorified rubber duck – it looks impressive floating in the bath of your codebase, but you have no idea what it's actually supposed to do. The perfect representation of every technical interview where you confidently wrote something that worked by accident.

Content I'M AJS DEVELOPER IT MEANS HE'S AFRAID OF TYPES UNSIGNED INT IS DEVELOPER ? I CAN DO TYPESCRIPT! STOP IT PATRICK, YOU'RE SCARING HIM

Content 4 Suddenly on Christmas you get a PC made of pulsating flesh, blood and bone with all the normal pc ports. It Has 1000 times mire computing power than your current PC but you have to feed it with a rat once a month. How would you react to that? 9.2k 1.7k Share

Content Python: What if everything was a dict? Java: What if everything was an object? JavaScript: What if everything was a dict and an object? C: What if everything was a pointer? APL: What if everything was an array? Tel: What if everything was a string? Prolog: What if everything was a term? LISP: What if everything was a pair? Scheme: What if everything was a function? Haskell: What if everything was a monad? Assembly: What if everything was a register? Cog: What if everything was a typeproposition? COBOL: WHAT IF EVERYTHING WAS UPPERCASE? C: What if everything was like Java, but different? Ruby: What if everything was monkey patched? Pascal: BEGIN What if everything was structured? END C: What if we added everything to the language? C11: What if we forgot to stop adding stuff? Rust: What if garbage collection didn't exist? Go: What if we tried designing C a second time? Perl: What if shell, sed, and awk were one language? Peri6: What if we took the joke too far? PHP: What if we wanted to make SQL injection easier? VB: What if we wanted to allow anyone to program? VB.NET: What if we wanted to stop them again? Forth: What if everything was a stack? ColorForth: What if the stack was green? PostScript: What if everything was printed at 600dpi? XSLT: What if everything was an XML element? Make: What if everything was a dependency? m4: What if everything was incomprehensibly quoted? Scala: What if Haskell ran on the JVM? Clojure: What if LISP ran on the JVM? Lua: What if game developers got tired of C? Mathematica: What if Stephen Wolfram invented everything? Malbolge: What if there is no god? nixcraft