Removing RAM: A Computer's Worst Nightmare

Nothing screams "technically accurate benchmark testing" like comparing your laptop's battery life to your failed relationship. This guy just created the most relatable unit of measurement in tech history—the "ex-girlfriend duration." The perfect 5-star review doesn't just evaluate specs—it absolutely destroys someone named Supriya in the process. Touchpad responsiveness: excellent. Two-way communication: superior to ex. Fingerprint recognition: exclusive access guaranteed (unlike someone's loyalty, apparently). This is what happens when you let heartbroken engineers write product reviews. The laptop gets 5 stars, Supriya gets -1, and 156 people found his emotional damage "helpful."

Ah, Sony's corporate strategy in a nutshell! While other companies might embrace industry standards, Sony's out here like a toddler refusing to share toys. Remember MiniDisc? Memory Stick? ATRAC? Blu-ray? It's like they have a pathological need to create their own proprietary format for everything , then act shocked when the rest of the tech world doesn't bow down in reverence. Their business model is basically "make consumers buy our specific cables and adapters until they weep." The tech equivalent of saying "I'm taking my ball and going home" except the ball is a weird pentagon shape that only fits in Sony-approved goals.

When the hotel advertises "high-speed internet" but you show up and it's just two ethernet cables you need to physically connect between buildings. Sure, technically it's a "direct connection" with "no router bottlenecks." Next they'll tell me their cloud service is just a USB stick taped to a weather balloon.

Remember when game devs hand-crafted assembly code to squeeze every cycle out of the PS2? Now they just throw more lights at the problem and hope DLSS will save them. Modern devs staring at their RTX 5090 wondering why their unoptimized mess runs like a slideshow. "But I added ray-tracing!" Yeah, and your grass simulation is calculating the aerodynamics of each individual blade. Maybe learn to write a shader that doesn't require NASA's computing budget.

Whoever made this deserves a promotion and a psych evaluation. It's a brilliant visual pun using electrical circuit diagrams to illustrate computing concepts. Serial processing executes tasks one after another (like killers waiting their turn), while parallel processing handles multiple tasks simultaneously (killing your CPU efficiency but getting the job done faster). After 15 years of optimizing code, I still chuckle when junior devs discover threading and suddenly want to parallelize everything. Sure kid, enjoy your race conditions and deadlocks—I'll be over here with my popcorn.

Ah, the classic "birds aren't real" conspiracy meets game dev limitations. Twenty years in the industry and I've seen rendering budgets dictate reality more times than I care to admit. That low-poly bird is basically what happens when your PM says "we need birds" but your GPU budget was already blown on realistic water physics. Nature's drones running at 10 FPS with PS1-era geometry. Next time someone tells you birds aren't real, just show them this absolute unit of optimization. Whoever rendered our simulation clearly had to make some tough choices in the resource allocation meeting.