Time Memes

Three different datetime formats, all equally wrong in their own special way. The first one at least tries to be logical with MM-DD-YYYY-hh-mm-ss, but then someone decided to shuffle the deck and put DD-MM-YYYY in the middle. The third one? YYYY-MM-DD leading the charge like it's ISO 8601's cool cousin. But notice what they all have in common? Those time components (hh, mm, ss) are getting progressively smaller and more forgotten, like they're being pushed off a cliff into irrelevance. Developers love to bikeshed about date formats until they're blue in the face, but the moment it comes to actually storing time precision? "Eh, just set it to 00:00:00 and call it a day." Then six months later someone files a bug because events scheduled for 2PM are showing up at midnight and everyone acts surprised. The time part isn't just decoration, folks—it's literally half the name.

So apparently we've been worshipping the wrong deity all along. While Christians organized their entire calendar around Jesus's birthday, programmers took one look at Gabriel Jarret playing teenage prodigy Mitch Taylor in the 1985 film "Real Genius" and collectively decided, "Yeah, this random actor's birthdate (January 1st, 1970) shall be the foundation of all computer time." The Unix epoch timestamp starts counting from midnight UTC on January 1, 1970—which happens to be Gabriel Jarret's actual birthdate. It's like the entire computing world accidentally created a religion around a child actor who would later play a genius in a comedy film. The irony is chef's kiss level. Every time you check a timestamp, log an event, or schedule a cron job, you're essentially measuring time from the birth of Mitch Taylor himself. Forget Y2K—we should be preparing for the Year 2038 problem when Gabriel Jarret turns 68 and our 32-bit signed integers overflow. That's when the real apocalypse happens.

Ah, the digital clock showing 9:77:58 – the perfect representation of what happens when you decide requirements are just "suggestions." This is basically what your code looks like when you decide that time constraints, logic, and basic physics are merely optional guidelines. Sure, there are only 60 minutes in an hour according to "conventional standards," but your code boldly asks: "Says who?" This is the same energy as returning a string when the function clearly asks for an integer. Revolutionary? Perhaps. Functional? Absolutely not. But hey, at least your code is consistent in its complete disregard for reality!