The PR Review From Hell

The classic trolley problem, but make it git. You've got one innocent developer on the upper track and a whole team on the lower track. What's a responsible engineer to do? Run git rebase master of course! Plot twist: rebasing doesn't actually save anyone. It just rewrites history so that lone developer who was safe on the upper track now gets yeeted to the lower track with everyone else. The team went from "we're all gonna die together" to "we're STILL all gonna die together, but now with a cleaner commit history." The best part? That "Successfully rebased and updated ref" message is basically git's way of saying "I did what you asked, don't blame me for the consequences." Sure, your branch looks linear and beautiful now, but at what cost? At what cost?! Pro tip: This is why some teams have a strict "no rebase on shared branches" policy. Because one person's quest for a pristine git log can turn into everyone's merge conflict nightmare faster than you can say git reflog .

The sweet taste of victory after Git warfare. That moment when you've spent 14 hours resolving merge conflicts across 10 branches spanning 3 repositories, each with its own unique naming convention and commit style. Your eyes are bloodshot, you've consumed dangerous amounts of caffeine, and your terminal history is just a long list of increasingly desperate git commands. And yet somehow—against all odds—the build passes, the tests run, and that glorious new version is now live in production. No alarms. No rollbacks. Just sweet, sweet redemption as you emerge from the trenches of version control hell. Time to take a shower. You've earned it.

That moment when your access to the company's GitHub repo gets revoked before HR even tells you you're fired. Nothing says "your services are no longer required" quite like git pushing you out of the organization! The digital equivalent of finding your desk contents in a cardboard box. Bonus anxiety: frantically checking if you committed that side project code before losing access forever.

The dark satisfaction of Windows developers inserting carriage return line feed (CRLF) into every merged file is perfectly captured here. While Unix-based systems use just LF (\n) for line endings, Windows insists on CRLF (\r\n) and will fight to the death for those extra bytes. Nothing like breaking git diffs and causing merge conflicts across operating systems because Windows decided in 1981 that mimicking typewriters was the future of computing. The smug expression says it all - "Yes, I've ruined your clean line endings, and I'd do it again."

OH. MY. GOD. The absolute HORROR of receiving an email where GitLab couldn't even be bothered to replace their Lorem Ipsum placeholder text! 😱 Nothing says "valued GitLab user" quite like "Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet" followed by some Latin gibberish that probably translates to "we copy-pasted this template and forgot to fill it in." The cherry on top? That ominous subject line about your project storage being DELETED while the actual email body is just vibing in placeholder land. Somewhere, a developer is having a complete meltdown realizing they pushed to production without checking their email templates. RIP to their weekend!

The MIT license literally says "do whatever you want with this code, I don't care." It's the most permissive open-source license out there—you can use it, modify it, sell it, tattoo it on your forehead, whatever. So when a dev slaps MIT on their repo and then has a meltdown on Twitter because someone actually *used* their code, it's like putting up a "FREE PIZZA" sign and then crying when people eat the pizza. The cat's bewildered stance perfectly captures the rest of us watching this drama unfold, wondering if they've ever actually read the license they chose. Pro tip: if you don't want people using your code, maybe don't pick the license that's basically the digital equivalent of "take it, it's yours."