I Need This For My Github PR Approvals

You know that moment when someone asks what you changed and you stare into the void trying to compress 47 file modifications, 3 refactors, 2 bug fixes, and that one random typo correction into a coherent sentence? Yeah, the -m flag becomes your worst enemy. The struggle is real when you've been in the zone for 2 hours, touched half the codebase, and now Git is asking you to summarize your life choices in one line. So you either write "fixed stuff" like a caveman or spend 10 minutes crafting a commit message longer than the actual code changes. Pro tip: This is why you commit early and often. But we all know you won't.

Companies pretending they're protecting "intellectual property" when the real reason they won't open source their code is because it's a horrifying mess of spaghetti logic, hardcoded credentials, and comments like "// TODO: fix this before demo (2018)". The corporate PR spin: "Our proprietary algorithms give us competitive advantage!" The actual codebase: 47 nested if-statements and a function called hack_it_until_it_works() that somehow powers the entire billing system.

The AI ethics bot just witnessed a child.kill() function and had a full-blown existential crisis. Classic case of "context matters" in programming. The bot's like "I can't assist with violence!" while the code's just handling thread management. Look at that beautiful irony - a recursively named AI refusing to help with perfectly innocent code because it contains a murder-sounding method. Six years of code reviews and I've never seen an AI clutch its digital pearls this hard.

ABSOLUTE CHAOS UNLEASHED! Some poor soul asks how to reverse a Git commit, and Linus Torvalds (you know, just the CREATOR OF LINUX) casually suggests running sudo rm -rf / which is basically the nuclear option that OBLITERATES YOUR ENTIRE FILESYSTEM! It's like asking how to undo a typo and someone suggesting you burn down your house! The victim even THANKED HIM! Someone please check if this developer's computer still exists! 💀

Ah, the classic code review battlefield! 🔥 Nothing triggers a developer's fight-or-flight response faster than hearing "Your code will work but I don't like the way it is implemented." It's like telling someone their baby is ugly but functional. 😂 We've all been there - spent hours crafting what we think is a masterpiece, only for some senior dev to casually suggest a "small refactor" that invalidates your entire approach. The code passes all tests? Runs perfectly? Doesn't matter! It's not elegant enough for their refined taste buds. This is basically the programming equivalent of starting a bar fight. Keyboards will fly, Stack Overflow links will be weaponized, and someone's going to end up crying into their mechanical keyboard at 2am while rewriting everything.

When your branch is stable enough for production but senior devs won't give you merge permissions. Welcome to git politics, where your code's quality matters less than your job title. The irony of being told to fix merge conflicts when you're literally not allowed to merge. That commit hash at the bottom is probably longer than your career at this company.