Blocked By GitHub Outage

When your Git push gets rejected by some obscure rule you didn't know existed. The terminal's giving you ASCII art of a dragon guarding your repo like it's a medieval treasure vault! That "Herald push rule H149" might as well be written in ancient runes. Nothing says "your code isn't worthy" quite like being denied by a mythical creature made of forward slashes and zeroes. Somewhere, a senior dev is cackling while sipping coffee from their "Git Gud" mug.

Ah, the classic parting gift from an unpaid intern - committing the API key directly to the .env file in their final act of corporate sabotage. Nothing says "thanks for the experience" like leaving a production credential in the version control history. Future security auditors will speak of this moment with reverence.

When your GitHub contributions actually change the world but your YouTube dance videos get all the fame. The knight with 500 GitHub followers stands tall and majestic—a true warrior of code who's probably fixed critical bugs in Linux kernels and contributed to libraries used by millions. Meanwhile, the tiny figure with 2 million YouTube subscribers is just showing off their "Hello World" tutorial with clickbait thumbnails. Real devs know where the true power lies. Quality over quantity, folks!

Ah, the classic GitHub existential crisis! Someone created a repo with the self-aware name "This project has no meaningful contribution to society" and then someone else opened an issue with the most dramatic comment possible: "We are in dire and immediate need of innovation." It's like showing up to a kid's lemonade stand and demanding they solve the global water crisis. The best part? The issue got 19 reactions and was promptly closed. Nothing says "welcome to open source" like passionate debates about projects that openly admit their uselessness. This is basically every developer's side project that started with "I'll change the world" and ended with "please don't look at my code."

Social etiquette has rules: don't ask women their age or men their salary. But the REAL taboo? Asking developers to explain their commit messages. "Fixed stuff" could mean anything from a minor CSS tweak to preventing the entire codebase from imploding. "Minor changes" might have rewritten the authentication system. And that cryptic "WIP" from 2019? It's now load-bearing code nobody dares to touch. The commit history is less documentation and more of a psychological thriller where "refactoring" is code for "I broke everything and fixed it before anyone noticed."

OH MY GOD! 😱 Someone just committed a file called "Simplify SECURITY.md" to the repo! That's like putting up a neon sign saying "HACKERS WELCOME!" 🚪🔓 When your coworker casually pushes "simplify security" to production, every sysadmin in a 10-mile radius gets heart palpitations! Next commit: "passwords.txt - just made it easier to remember guys!" 💀 Security teams everywhere are screaming internally right now. "Simplify security" is just corporate speak for "I disabled all the firewalls because they were slowing down my downloads." 🔥