Why I Have Trust Issues With Users

Content The AI suggestions are a bit wrong so I just write the code myself After two hours of debugging it turns out the AI was right

Programmers will spend $150 on a gaming mouse with 15 programmable buttons but only use it to click "Run" and "Copy/Paste Stack Overflow solutions." The irony of owning hardware with more features than your actual code is *chef's kiss*. Sure, those macro buttons could automate your workflow, but why do that when you can just continue your sacred ritual of "ctrl+c, ctrl+v, pray it works"?

Content GENTLEMEN, IT IS WITH GREAT PLEASURE TO INFORM YOU THAT TODAY I BROKE PRODUCTION

Ah, the classic "#DEFINE MADNESS" - doing the same thing over and over while expecting different results. Twenty years in this industry and I still catch myself hammering that compile button like it's going to magically fix itself. Meanwhile, the compiler is just sitting there thinking, "This idiot is sending me the exact same broken code repeatedly. Should we tell him or just keep launching errors like a medieval catapult?" The real kicker? That one time you compile the same code without changing anything and it suddenly works. That's when you know the universe is just messing with you.

Content STEP, DEBUG, BREAK POINTS CONSOLE LOG( 'HERE')

When your non-programmer friend suggests "going outside" as if that's a real solution to debugging, so you maliciously comply by running Unix commands on your Mac. The terminal doesn't care about your social deficiencies - it just tells you there's no such file as "grass". Typical. Now you're back to square one with a syntax error and vitamin D deficiency.