The Real Coding Time Distribution

Ah, the diagram that makes even senior devs question their understanding of parallel computing. It's like trying to explain the difference between "your" and "you're" to someone who insists they're identical. This confusing web of "is" and "is not" relationships perfectly captures why technical interviews about concurrency make everyone sweat. You think you understand it until someone asks you to explain the difference, then suddenly you're drawing circles on a whiteboard while questioning your career choices. The best part? No matter how confidently you explain this to junior devs, they'll give you that blank stare that says "I'll just Google this again next week when I forget."

Simple task: print numbers 1-10. Developer asks ChatGPT to do it. Instead of a basic loop, it delivers a recursive function. "Not bad," thinks the developer, and asks for optimization. ChatGPT's response? "Let's spawn threads for each recursive call!" The result is computational chaos—a CPU-melting, fan-screaming disaster that turns a 3-line solution into a parallel processing nightmare. It's like asking for a screwdriver and getting a nuclear-powered jackhammer with rocket boosters. Classic AI overengineering at its finest!

Content The original it's a feature not a bug

Content Chris Albon chrisalbon Software engineering pro-tip: Follow Do not, I repeat, do not deploy this week. That is how you end up debugging a critical issue from your parent's wifi in your old bedroom while your spouse hates you for abandoning them with your racist uncle. 8:49 PM - 19 Dec 2017 11,775 Retweets 23,488 Likes 254 17 12K 23K Sat

Content Developers when there's a bug they've fixed before DAY PS I'm gonna have to google the shit out of this. BUNKS 020ZEWBVC-2-4802040-23-3 ProdrammerHumor.io

Ah, the sacred tomes of legacy code! A stack of books with the spine message "THESE BOOKS ARE HERE FOR AN ESSENTIAL STRUCTURAL PURPOSE. THEY ARE NOT FOR SALE." is basically the perfect metaphor for that 15-year-old codebase nobody understands but everyone's terrified to touch. Just like these books holding up some mysterious shelf, that spaghetti code written by a developer who left in 2008 is somehow keeping your entire production system from collapsing. Touch it? Refactor it? Don't be ridiculous! It's not meant to be understood—it's meant to be structural . The irony is delicious. We spend years learning clean code principles only to worship at the altar of "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" when faced with the ancient scripts. The documentation? Oh, that left with Dave from Engineering years ago.