The Bug That Broke The Developer

Content I Am Devloper iamdevloper shoutout to the absolute heroes out there still downvoting questions on Stack Overflow during coronavirus lockdown. Traduci il Tweet 12:51 24 mar 20 Twitter Web App 351 Retweet 3.259 Mi pace 17 Sander DeBoezelaere 24 mar In risposta a iamdevloper Closed: this topic is too vague, ambiguous and duplicate from one year ago by same user. twitter.comiamdevloperst... (r) I Am Devloper iamdevlo... 24 apr 19 ah, empty day ahead, what to do... fix issues in own life? nah, too hard downvote a 4 year old Stack Overflow question because it wasn't quite phrased correctly according to guidelines? game 9 2 17 96 or in

Content Noooo, that's what debuggers are for!! 34 34 Debug using print) Debug using print) 14 14 0.1 10score 55 imgRip.com 2 70 85 100 115 130 2 0.1 145

The classic "have you tried turning it off and on again?" approach has apparently made it to the operating room! When your code throws inexplicable errors, rebooting is your Hail Mary pass. When your patient flatlines... maybe try literally anything else first? The terrifying reality that the same troubleshooting logic we apply to our stubborn servers is being suggested for human bodies is peak programmer humor. Next they'll be suggesting to check if the patient is properly plugged in or needs a firmware update.

You know that legacy codebase held together by duct tape, prayers, and a single try-catch block? Yeah, this is its physical manifestation. Someone's got a VGA-to-PS/2 adapter chained to what looks like a USB converter, all dangling precariously from the back of a machine that's probably running critical production systems. The "there is always a WAY" caption captures that beautiful moment when you realize your Frankenstein solution actually works, and now you're too terrified to touch it. Nobody knows why it works. Nobody WANTS to know. The documentation is just a sticky note that says "DON'T UNPLUG." It's been running for 847 days straight. The company's entire billing system depends on it. And if you breathe on it wrong, the whole thing collapses like a poorly written recursive function without a base case.

That one teammate who shows up at the last minute with a half-baked pull request while everyone else has been pushing the project forward for weeks. The classic "I helped" contribution that somehow makes it into the final demo despite breaking three unit tests. At least they remembered to add their name to the README.md!

Content 1 checked the coding on mat drops: if (hasEnough true) giveMore; else if (hasEnough false) dontGive; Normally I'd grudgingly upvote for haha funny. But you didn't even put the effort into getting the comparison syntax right. is definition. is a boolean check. is a syntax error, my friend. Vote arammerHumor.io