Search And Destroy: Legacy Code Edition

Content Is it possible to disable the network in iOS Simulator? Get personalized job matches now stackoverflow Get started 281 am trying to debug some inconsistent behaviour I am seeing in an application that gets its primary data from the internet. I don't see the issues in the simulator, just on the device, so l'd like to reproduce the network and connectivity environment in the simulator. Is there any way of disabling the network in the simulator? 17 Answers active oldest Use a simple Faraday cage to block or limit the external RF signal level. 1214 You can make your own with aluminum foil. The openings should be smaller than the wavelength of your data service if that's what you want to block. 800 Mhz has a 37 cm (14) wavelength, 1900 Mhz has a 16 cm (6) wavelength. This works better with an actual device than with the simulator since the Mac is hard to work on when inside the Faraday cage ;-) share improve this answer edited Aug 27 '13 at 19:56 answered Dec 12 '12 at 1:12 , progrmr 57.2k 13 88 135

THE ABSOLUTE AUDACITY of showing someone your code and having to immediately follow it with a disclaimer! There you are, exposing your digital soul to the world, and all you can say is "it ain't much and it doesn't work." HONEY, THAT'S THE PROGRAMMER ANTHEM! The sheer vulnerability of showing someone your janky, duct-taped monstrosity that somehow passes for code is the most authentic developer experience in existence. We're all just farmers in the digital fields, growing our barely-functioning algorithms and praying for a good harvest that never comes! 💅

Started the day with a perfectly functional codebase, ended it with a segmentation fault. Just another Tuesday! The skeleton weightlifter represents my physical and mental state after 12 hours of debugging memory allocation issues. That moment when your code goes from "it works on my machine" to "core dumped" faster than you can say "pointer arithmetic." The best part? I probably caused it by trying to optimize something that was already working fine. Nothing says "software engineer" like turning functional code into a spectacular crash because you just HAD to refactor that one function.

When your code review finally gets personal. This guy skipped all the polite GitHub comments like "consider refactoring this method" and went straight for the jugular. Reminds me of that senior dev who once told me my variable naming convention was "a crime against humanity." The truth hurts, but at least he didn't create a PowerPoint presentation about my nested if statements.

Introducing the revolutionary "Grok 4" – where version control is just a suggestion and your entire codebase fits in a single text file! 🔥 Just imagine the sheer efficiency of debugging 10,000 lines of code by scrolling frantically through a single document. Who needs Git when you can just attach your entire life's work as "all_code.txt" and pray nothing gets corrupted? The best part? You can "implement features in 5 seconds" – which is exactly how long it'll take before your colleagues start plotting your mysterious disappearance. Modern problems require ancient solutions!

Someone updated that drowning counter with count++ instead of ++count and now zero people have drowned wearing lifejackets. Technically correct is the best kind of correct, right? The sign maker probably tested it once, saw it worked, shipped it to production, and went home early. Meanwhile, the lifejacket stat is sitting there at zero like "not my problem." Fun fact: The difference between i++ and ++i has caused more bugs than anyone wants to admit. Post-increment returns the value THEN increments it, while pre-increment does it the other way around. It's the programming equivalent of putting your shoes on before your socks—technically you did both things, just in the wrong order.