Roses Are Red, Errors Are True

Content Pull requests issues Gist Search 4 Repositories Code Issues ee Wikis 1 Users Languages Text C HTML XML CSV JSON SQL JavaScript Markdown Gettext Catalog 10.045 3,616 339 203,180 73.705 52,115 37,813 17.542 17,294 10.857 8,212 6.415 Advanced search Cheat sheet forgive me Search We've found 10,045 code results Sort: Best match Y kaelzhangnode-stares - stares.js Showing the top two matches. Last indexed on 16 Sep. use strict: var expect require 'chai').expect; var stares requires ..); Oh, forgive me, it will be killing me to write test cases with multiple processes. describe("master", function ()( JavaScript dtrombleemy-site - mainController.js Showing the top two matches. Last indexed on 23 Sep. angular gods, please forgive me angular.element (document. getElementById( 'view-master')).removeClass('hidden'); JavaScript "1); thomasythuangBugatti - main.js Showing the top two matches. Last indexed on 21 Sep. I know this is really jank plz forgive me ('location-form') .attr('action', "accountdeletelocation'); JavaScript

Content FuckltJS Javascript Error Steamroller FuckitJS uses state-of-the-art technology to make sure your javascript code runs whether your compiler likes it or not. Technology Through a process known as Eval-Rinse-Reload-And-Repeat, FuckltJS repeatedly compiles your code, detecting errors and slicing those lines out of the script. To survive such a violent process, FuckltJS reloads itself after each iteration, allowing the onerror handler to catch every single error in your terribly written code. Installation 1. Include Query, because everything requires Query 2. Include "fuckit.is" 3. The End

The perfect visualization of a production deployment on Friday at 4:55 PM. Left guy is in full zen mode because he's already updated his resume. Middle guy with the thousand-yard stare knows exactly who wrote that garbage code but can't say anything because it was him. Right guy is frantically Googling "how to rollback nuclear meltdown" while realizing Stack Overflow is down. Meanwhile, the entire system is about to go thermonuclear because someone forgot to escape a single quote in a SQL query.

When a senior dev asks if you wrote code without comments, you know you're about to face a military tribunal-level interrogation. The look of utter disbelief followed by immediate sentencing is just *chef's kiss*. Submitting uncommented code to review is basically a declaration of war against your fellow developers. Future maintainers will be excavating your logic like archaeologists trying to decipher hieroglyphics without a Rosetta Stone. Remember folks, code tells the computer what to do, but comments tell other humans why you did it that way. Skip them at your peril!

Non-programmers imagine us as mysterious hackers typing at lightning speed, fingers blurring across keyboards like we're disarming digital bombs. Reality? We're just confused children staring at our code for hours, trying to figure out why adding a semicolon fixed everything or why removing a perfectly good line made the whole thing work. The facial expression of pure confusion and existential doubt is the true programmer uniform. No hoodie required.

Ah, the classic StackOverflow NaN test debate! Someone wrote a beautifully elegant isNaN() function that simply checks if a number isn't equal to itself ( num != num ), which is actually brilliant because that's the only time equality fails in JavaScript/Python. But then some principled developer comes along and declares it "prohibited witchcraft" despite admitting it works perfectly. This is coding purity culture at its finest. "Yes, your three-line solution works flawlessly, but I'm morally obligated to insist you use the official 50-line implementation with seventeen edge cases instead." The real witchcraft is how StackOverflow manages to turn elegant solutions into religious debates since 2009.