Can You Also Please Resolve Them

The expectation vs reality of game development is brutally accurate here! On the left, we have the beautiful, detailed vision of what your character should look like when planning your game. Then there's the right side—the hysterical breakdown when you realize your masterpiece has morphed into a pepperoni-faced monstrosity after two years of development hell. Every game developer knows that initial spark of genius: "I'll create the next indie masterpiece!" Fast forward through 730 nights of debugging collision detection, memory leaks, and shader compilation errors—and suddenly you're crying while staring at what can only be described as a pizza with existential dread. Feature creep, scope explosion, and the inevitable "just one more system to implement" have claimed another victim. But hey, ship it anyway! Version 1.0 is just the beginning of your pizza-faced character's journey to eventual Steam obscurity.

The infinite loop of "I'll be there in 5 minutes" is the perfect recursion tutorial nobody asked for. Just like that function that keeps calling itself without a proper base case, this person is stuck in an endless cycle of "almost there" promises. And when threatened with consequences? The classic solution: just restart the recursion! Forget fancy textbooks—this chat exchange teaches you everything about recursion: it never ends, solves nothing, and eventually crashes your relationships.

Content Catalin Cimpanu campuscodi Conversation between two users in a 15-year-old MySQL bug entry (still not fixed) bugs.mysql.combug.php?id114.. 21 Jun 2019 14:56 Henry Ayala Soon this bug is going to be old enough to take driving lessons. 9 Nov 2019 7:17 Owen Gallagher 7553 000 3 2000 00000 re arcer over veara 11 Nov 2019 9:12 Fabio Napodano would be nice to know how 1s life of the bug report opener. is he still alive? Is he actually still using MySQL? 12 Nov 2019 14:291 Omer Barnir Thanka for asking. I'm alive and well, and waing MySQL. 9:21 AM Jun 11, 2020 Twitter Web App 121 Retweets 318 Likes

The chart itself is a masterclass in irony—a completely broken visualization about chart accuracy. Notice how the x-axis and y-axis don't even make sense together? That's the joke swallowing its own tail. Apparently, coding your visualization gives you a 74.9% chance of success if you think (but only 52.8% if you don't bother with that pesky thinking process). Meanwhile, GUI tools clock in at 69.1%, and "vibe charting"—that scientific approach where you just go with whatever looks pretty—nets you a solid 30.8%. The supreme irony? This chart about chart accuracy is itself a statistical abomination. Different categories on the x-axis, percentages that don't relate to each other, and a complete disregard for data visualization principles. It's like watching someone give a PowerPoint presentation about public speaking while tripping over their own shoelaces.

Content Joe Magerramov joemag. The 8 year old is learning Python, and after a dealing with a syntax bug she asks: "If the computer knows I'm missing a semicolon here, why won't it add it itself?" I don't know. I really don't know. 7:03 AM 08 Feb 22 Twitter for iPhone Martin Pi Daddy is probably making the 8 year old learning C or Java in disguise. 13h Like Reply 130

Content Read 10:00 pm Your firebase allows anyone to read information Read 10:00 pm I'll send you a link do you have girlfriend ? 10:00 pm i want to be your gf 10:00 pm u very smart 10:00 pm Read 10:01 pm 10:01 pm https:firebase.google.comdocs rulesinsecure-rules Avoid insecure rules Fire... Stay organized with collections Save and categori... Read 10:02 pm Follow that to fix the issue nOO 10:02.pm 10:02 pm