Abbreviate And Suffer The Consequences

Nothing says "I've made poor career choices" quite like spending 14 hours debugging a feature that works perfectly in Chrome, Firefox, and Edge, only to have Safari render it like it's 2007. You build something beautiful, test it everywhere, then Safari comes along like that one relative who still uses Internet Explorer and asks "what's the cloud?" The worst part? Apple's response is basically "sounds like a you problem." Meanwhile, you're questioning every CSS flex property you've ever written and contemplating a peaceful life as a goat farmer instead.

This is what happens when you let someone who learned architecture from YouTube tutorials and Stack Overflow answers design your house. The building looks like it was refactored 17 times by different junior devs who all said "it works on my machine." Windows positioned like UI elements dragged randomly in a Visual Studio form designer. That balcony clearly started as a simple feature request before scope creep turned it into whatever monstrosity we're looking at now. The structural integrity is probably maintained by hopes, prayers, and something equivalent to jQuery patches. This is the physical manifestation of "we'll fix it in production" and "ship now, refactor later." Bet the architect submitted this with a commit message that just said "final_house_ACTUALLY_FINAL_v3.2_USE_THIS_ONE.blueprint"

Listen up, children! Gather 'round for tales of the ANCIENT TIMES! Back in the mystical era of VB 6.0, we didn't have your fancy object-oriented programming with inheritance hierarchies and polymorphic nightmares! NO! We wrote pseudo code that magically worked! Just slapped some spaghetti code together, hit compile, and BOOM—functioning software! No encapsulation, no abstraction, just pure, chaotic WORKING CODE! Those were the days when men were men and bugs were features! *dramatically wipes tear* The simplicity! The madness! The absolute HORROR of maintaining it years later!

Content Masaratione for manimulatino o seast ie Gued lo cometerseas? modifiers). The fundamental structure of any Java programme should look like: (package declarations import statements (class declaration 2.2 Simple Java Program Let's look more closely at about the simplest Java program you can have one that simply prints a message to the console window: public class FirstSample public static void main(String args) System. out printin("We will not use 'Hello, World!"); is worth spending all the time that you need to become comfortable with the framework: pieces will recur in all applications. First and foremost, Java is case sensitive. If

Content Ta ProgrammerHumor 12d therelFixedit EXCEPTION IN Indentation error. Good luck figuring out where. Here is the exact class and method where things went wrong, folloned by the exception it bad, And here is how this method was called all the way from the beginning of the thread. As long as you recognize your classes and methods, you should be fine. 9,642 447 Comments m tProgrammerHumor 12d exception YouMeanError EXCEPTION IN A 2.0k OH, SO YOU JUST HAD SOME EXCEPTIONS IN THE CODE DONT WORRY, WE GOT YOU COVERED JUST ADD SOME PARENTHESES IN LINE 67 KILL YOURSELF 4 16.9k J L 462 Comments 4.2k

Content There's a thing called "Rubber duck debugging" in which a programmer explains the code to a rubber duck in hopes of finding the bug Ultrafacts.tumblr.com cosrnos: lifeofdavo: kierenwalkerpds: monobeartheater: absorr: ultrafacts: Source For more posts like this, CLICK HERE to follow Ultrafacts Some of you are reblogging because you think its funny that programmers would talk to ducks. I'm reblogging because I think its funny picturing a programmer explaining their code, realizing what they did when they explain the bad code, then grabbing the strangling the duck while yelling "WHY WAS THE FIX THAT SIMPLE!? AM I GOING BLIND!" AS A PROGRAMMER I CAN TELL YOU THAT THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT YOU FUCKING DO WE HAD TO BAN THE DUCKS FROM MY CLASSES BECAUSE EVERYONE WOULD FLIP THE DUCK OR THROW IT AT A WALL OR SOMETHING WHEN THEY FIGURED OUT THE PROBLEM IN THEIR CODE so that's the function of a rubber duck I work at a startup and part of the onboarding package you get when you Tirst start working here now includes a rubber duck. We also have a bigger version of the duck for the extra hard problems. Sometimes one duck doesn't cut it and you need to borrow your neighbors to get more ducks on the problem. One time we couldn't figure out why something wasn't working right so we assembled the counsel of ducks and by the grace of the Duck Gods were we able to finally come to a solution. These ducks have saved many lives and should be respected for the heroes they are Source: ultrafacts 254.607 notes