Our SQL: Database For The People

Content Stephen Gower As someone who has been developing websites since NCSA Mosaic was the only browser available, I'd just like to say that I'm really fcking tired of all the smart assholes out there continuously developing entirely new ways to build web applications. It started simple enough, just html and javascript. Then Cold Fusion. Then java applets. Then java servlets. Then 5 or 6 different Java application servers, EJBs, JSP, struts, XSLT, PHP. But screw all of that. We need Spring. No wait, we need Ruby.and Rails. Wait, we need Query. screw Query. We need AngularJs, and Backbone, and Ember! The world just won't be right until we have 12 different ways to do the same thing in Javascript! Forget all those server-side things you learned. Node js is here! No-wait. F'ck Node. Use Google Go! Honestly how many times are we going to re-invent this wheel? Unless you stay current with all of this nonsense, you basically become unhireable. I'm sure some of you 20 and 30-somethings have already experienced some of this fatigue. Now just imaging 10-15 more years where every 3 years a good portion of what you learned before is now obsolete, and you'll feel like I do.

First tweet: "Look at me! I built a SaaS with AI and zero coding! People actually pay for this!" Two days later: "Help! I'm being hacked! My API keys are maxed out, people are bypassing subscriptions, and my database is a dumpster fire!" The classic "I'm not technical" + "I skipped all security measures" combo strikes again. Turns out that building a product without understanding the fundamentals is like building a house with popsicle sticks—impressive until the first strong wind. Friendly reminder: AI can write your code, but it can't protect you from your own hubris. Security isn't just a vibe killer—it's actually kind of important.

Content const const const const const final JS lava mikeorganisciak.com

The holy trinity of database emptiness! While they all technically mean "no value," each head has its own personality. NIL is the goofy legacy value from languages like LISP, NULL is the serious SQL standard that strikes fear in JOIN operations everywhere, and NONE is Python's laid-back approach to nothingness. The three-headed dragon perfectly captures how developers must constantly wrestle with different representations of "nothing" depending on their language or database. And the best part? They're all equally capable of destroying your code with a single unexpected appearance! Bonus points if you've ever spent hours debugging only to find a NULL where you expected an empty string.

Content .: Turkcell Wi-Fi S 00:51 4 0 0 59 0 Christian Full Stack Developer Divine Technology Systems LLC Remote Remote Job details salary 65,000 - 75,000 a year Job Type Full-time Remote Qualifications Microsoft SQL Server: 2 years (Preferred) C: 2 years (Preferred) Querv: 1 vear (Preferred) Benefits Pulled from the full job description Apply now ProdrammerHumor.io

Content is a horrible language. It's made more horrible by the fact that a lot of substandard programmers use it, to the point where it's much much easier to generate total and utter crap with it. Quite frankly, even if the choice of Y were to do nothing but keep the programmers out, that in itself would be a huge reason to use Y In other words: the choice of Y is the only sane choice. I've come to the conclusion that any programmer that would prefer the project to be in X over Wis likely a programmer that I really would prefer to piss off, so that he doesn't come and screw up any project I'm involved with.