Training In New Techniques

When philosophers ask if a clone is the same person, programmers swoop in with the actual technical answer. Clone by reference? Same memory address, same person. Clone by value? New memory allocation, different person. Leave it to devs to solve ancient philosophical debates with a one-liner about pointers. This is why we're not invited to dinner parties.

OH MY GOD THIS IS GOLD! 😂 The meme puts the invention of the wheel and fire—you know, just the LITERAL FOUNDATIONS OF HUMAN CIVILIZATION —on the same timeline as the US government supposedly declaring C and C++ as "bad programming languages." The absolute AUDACITY to suggest that some bureaucratic programming language opinion is comparable to discovering FIRE! This is peak programmer persecution complex energy! As if C/C++ developers are being hunted like witches in Salem! Meanwhile, these languages still power everything from operating systems to rockets while programmers argue about semicolons on Twitter!

The fastest way to summon a C++ developer to explain why you're wrong? Tweet "I love C++." Apparently, it takes exactly 34 minutes of trying to use the language before the Stockholm syndrome wears off and reality sets in. That tweet aged like milk left in a memory leak. The duality of every C++ programmer: loving it publicly while privately wondering why they chose a language where even printing "Hello World" requires sacrificing your firstborn to the template gods.

In English, the letters 'i' and 'j' are just skinny little characters that barely make an impact. But in programming? Those loop counters bench press your entire codebase. Nothing quite like watching your nested for loops with i,j variables crush through 10,000 iterations without breaking a sweat. Those humble little variables carry the weight of algorithms that would make mere mortals collapse. Seven years into my career and I'm still naming my loop counters i,j,k like it's some sacred tradition passed down from the elders of computer science.

C++ developers watching Rust evangelists talk about memory safety is the programming equivalent of a wolf staring down a chihuahua. Sure, the chihuahua is making valid points about not eating the neighbors, but the wolf's been managing just fine with raw power and sharp teeth for decades, thank you very much. After 35 years of manual memory management, we've seen some things. And yeah, maybe we've caused a few segfaults that took down production servers at 2AM, but that's just character building.

Ah, the classic C++ vs Python showdown. Your friend spent weeks crafting 1000 lines of pointer arithmetic, memory management, and template metaprogramming to shave off those precious microseconds, then drags you into their cave to show off their benchmark results like they've discovered fire. Meanwhile, your 10-line Python script just quietly gets the job done while you were out having a life. Sure, their code runs 100x faster, but yours was written 100x faster. The real question is: who's got time to maintain those 990 extra lines when the deadline's on Friday?