Please Use Static Analysis On Your C++ Codebase

The first part of this authentication function is actually doing its job—checking if the password matches. But then comes the security masterpiece: if (true == true) . Congratulations, you've created the digital equivalent of a bouncer who checks your ID and then lets you in anyway because "yep, gravity still works!" This function will authenticate literally anyone who gets past the first check... or fails it and just keeps trying. Security experts hate this one weird trick!

That smug feeling when you post a "help me fix this code" question on a C++ forum, but it's actually a homework assignment you're trying to get solved for free. Those poor souls thinking they're helping a fellow developer in need, when they're really just doing your assignment. The digital equivalent of tricking someone into carrying your furniture because you told them you're "just rearranging things."

The code shows a simple function to add two numbers, then a recursive monstrosity that calls itself with the result. Meanwhile, Hollywood thinks this basic arithmetic is somehow "PLANTING MALWARE." This is peak r/itsaunixsystem material. Somewhere, a technical consultant is crying into their keyboard while a director proudly declares "make it more hackery!" The function literally just returns x + y, but apparently that's enough to bring down the Pentagon in movie logic. Next up: using a for loop will launch nuclear missiles, and printing "Hello World" will erase all student loan debt.

The pointer gang welcomes newbies with open arms—unless you're dealing with void pointers. While char*, int*, and float* pointers all have their quirks, at least they point to something concrete. But void*? That's the programming equivalent of staring into an existential abyss. It points to... well, anything... or nothing. No type checking, no safety nets, just raw memory addresses and chaos. When a junior asks what type to give the void pointer, the senior's face says it all: "Pick literally anything else unless you want to spend your weekend debugging memory corruption." Ah, the dark arts of C/C++ memory management—where one wrong dereference separates a working program from a segfault nightmare.

The eternal C++ struggle summed up in one painful exchange. You spend an hour debugging a function that seemingly does nothing, only to realize the horrifying truth - you never actually called it. Just declared it and walked away like it would magically execute itself. The worst part? This happens to 10-year veterans as often as day-one beginners. Nothing quite matches that special feeling of wanting to throw your mechanical keyboard through a window after realizing your carefully crafted game physics engine isn't running because you forgot the parentheses.

The bravado of developers who claim they "fear no API" only to cower in terror at the sight of Vulkan is just *chef's kiss*. For the uninitiated, Vulkan is the low-level graphics API that makes even seasoned graphics programmers wake up in cold sweats. It's like saying "I'm great at assembling IKEA furniture" and then being handed the blueprints to build the actual IKEA store from scratch. The documentation alone is thicker than a computer science textbook, and the error messages might as well be written in ancient Sumerian. Meanwhile, OpenGL (referenced in the title) is like the friendly neighborhood graphics API that suddenly looks like a cuddly kitten in comparison.