Look How They Massacred My AWK

The vi/vim/neovim progression really is the Pokémon evolution of text editors—each one more powerful and unnecessarily complex than the last. You start with vi (barely functional, can't even exit), evolve to vim (now you can customize EVERYTHING), and finally reach neovim (Lua configs and a plugin ecosystem that rivals npm). But the real tragedy here? The yearning for ed/edd/eddy as text editors. For those who don't know, ed is the OG Unix line editor from 1969—so minimal it makes vi look like Microsoft Word. You literally edit files one line at a time with cryptic commands. It's what your grandfather used to write C code uphill both ways. The joke works on multiple levels: it's a Cartoon Network reference, a commentary on the Unix philosophy of evolution, and a sarcastic jab at people who gatekeep text editors. Because nothing says "I'm a real programmer" like pining for a 50-year-old editor that has less features than Notepad.

Ah, the classic bait-and-switch of programming education! Kids think they're entering a magical world of creativity with drag-and-drop blocks and cute animations, only to discover their future involves staring at terminal windows for hours debugging merge conflicts. It's like expecting to become a chef by playing cooking games, then discovering real kitchens involve mostly dishwashing and knife sharpening. The gap between Scratch/educational programming and "rm -rf node_modules && npm install" is the greatest plot twist in tech careers.

Some developer just installed Arch Linux on a vape. Because why enjoy nicotine when you can enjoy kernel panic attacks instead? The screen proudly displays neofetch with that iconic ASCII Arch logo made of characters, complete with system specs. 728MB of RAM - perfect for running exactly one terminal instance before it crashes. Next up: getting Doom to run on it, because that's the true benchmark of unnecessary computing.

The legendary editor wars have found common ground! Vim and Emacs users—sworn enemies since the dawn of computing—finally unite over their shared disdain for Nano. It's like finding out that Batman and Joker both hate karaoke. For the uninitiated: Vim demands arcane keyboard combinations that make your fingers do gymnastics. Emacs requires more modifier keys than there are stars in the galaxy. Meanwhile, Nano just sits there with its friendly interface and helpful shortcuts at the bottom, committing the cardinal sin of being... accessible . The tweet response "I knew there'd be a day when we could unite" is the perfect cherry on top of this decades-long rivalry finding its true common enemy—simplicity.

The perfect metaphor for the Vim user in every dev team. While everyone else is silently mourning the death of simplicity in text editors, that one developer just has to announce their undying loyalty to Vim. It's like a funeral for normal editing workflows, and the Vim enthusiast still can't resist the urge to tell everyone about their 47 custom keybindings and how they can delete a word with "diw" faster than you can reach for your mouse. The coffin might as well contain the remains of productive team discussions that don't devolve into editor wars.

Oh look, another Bash victim! While "riding a bike" sticks with you forever, Bash scripting is that special hell where your muscle memory means absolutely nothing. You'll spend 20 minutes Googling how to write a basic for loop for the 500th time, wondering why the syntax looks like it was designed by someone smashing random keys. And don't get me started on those cryptic one-liners that work perfectly until you add a space somewhere and suddenly your script is formatting your hard drive. It's the programming equivalent of assembling IKEA furniture with instructions written in hieroglyphics... while blindfolded.