Worst Case In Linear Complexity

Looking at that isEven function hurts my soul on a spiritual level. Someone's literally checking if a number is even by hard-coding individual cases (0 is even, 1 is odd, 2 is even, 3 is odd...) instead of just using the modulo operator ( return num % 2 === 0 ). And they're doing this while casually flying 30,000 feet in the air with a gorgeous view! The perfect combo of terrible code and flex. My sanity would jump out that window faster than you can say "runtime complexity."

Dad's not a veterinarian—he's a debugger ! The kid thinks daddy can fix a hedgehog because "he fixes bugs every day," but plot twist: those animal books are actually programming manuals with cute critters on the covers! Python, C#, JavaScript... turns out the only animals this dev dad knows are the ones living in his code forest. The ultimate dad joke that works on two levels—just like a good inheritance hierarchy!

Finally, an elevator designed by a programmer! The ground floor is 0, not 1, because arrays start at 0 and so should our buildings. That green button is practically screaming "I'm the selected index!" The non-programmers must be so confused when they hit "1" expecting the lobby but end up on what normal humans call the "second floor." Bet the building's GitHub repo has 47 open issues about "intuitive floor numbering" that the dev team has marked as "won't fix" and "working as intended."

The expectation vs. reality of programmer debates is brutally accurate here. Non-programmers imagine us as epic monsters battling over algorithm efficiency and optimization techniques—like we're all dropping knowledge bombs about quicksort complexity. Meanwhile, in the trenches, we're actually like those ridiculous mascot costumes, getting heated about whether dateUpdated or updatedDate is the superior variable name. Seven years of experience and I've witnessed three-hour meetings derailed by naming conventions while actual bugs collect dust in the backlog. The real holy wars aren't about performance—they're about whether your camelCase is dromedary enough.

Google Gemini just gave the most "random" string in the history of random strings. Nothing says "I'm definitely not using a pattern" like literally using the alphabet followed by sequential numbers. That's like asking for a random password and getting "password123". Next they'll tell us their favorite dice roll is always 3.5.

Top panel shows assembly code with "is0dd" function checking if a number is odd by bitwise operations. Bottom panel shows someone who skipped all that and just lit up LEDs on a breadboard. Why write complex bitwise logic when electricity already knows if a current is odd or even? The universe's physics engine doesn't need your fancy algorithms - electrons have been doing modulo operations since the Big Bang.