computer science Memes

Ah yes, the classic interview question that makes everyone suddenly develop amnesia about their childhood dreams. "I wanted to change the world! Innovate! Create!" Nah, who are we kidding? We saw those Silicon Valley salary packages and suddenly algorithms became VERY interesting. Nothing says "passion for technology" quite like realizing you can afford guacamole at Chipotle without checking your bank account first. The brutal honesty is refreshing though—at least Mr. Krabs here isn't pretending he got into CS because he was "fascinated by computational theory" at age 12.

Let's be real here—nobody grows up dreaming about pointers and segmentation faults. We all had that romanticized vision of building the next Facebook or creating AI that would change the world. Then reality hit: rent is due, student loans are calling, and suddenly a six-figure salary for writing CRUD apps sounds pretty damn good. The passion for technology? Sure, some of us had it. But most of us saw those salary surveys and thought "wait, you're telling me I can make THIS much for sitting in air conditioning and arguing about tabs vs spaces?" Sold. Five years later you're debugging legacy code at 2 AM, but hey, at least your bank account doesn't cry anymore.

Let's be real here—nobody wakes up at 3 AM debugging segfaults because they're "passionate about technology." We all had that romanticized vision of changing the world with code, but then rent was due and suddenly those FAANG salaries started looking pretty motivating. Sure, some people genuinely love the craft, but for most of us? It was the promise of a stable paycheck, remote work, and not having to wear pants to meetings. The tech industry basically turned an entire generation into mercenaries with mechanical keyboards.

Someone discovered the perfect naming convention and honestly, it's both genius and absolutely cursed. Binary digit → bit. Makes sense. Ternary digit → tit. Wait, hold on— The logic is flawless. Base-2 (binary) starts with 'b', add 'it', you get 'bit'. Base-3 (ternary) starts with 't', add 'it', you get... well, a term that's gonna make every code review extremely uncomfortable. Imagine explaining to your manager why your ternary computing documentation keeps getting flagged by HR. Fun fact: The actual term is "trit" (trinary digit), but where's the fun in being technically correct when you can watch Gru's face perfectly capture the exact moment this realization hits? Ternary computing is real though—it uses three states (0, 1, 2) instead of binary's two, and some Soviet computers actually used it. They probably had very interesting technical documentation.

Oh honey, the AUDACITY of thinking you can just have two things talk to each other directly! That's barbaric! Uncivilized! What are we, cavemen writing spaghetti code?! No no no, the "solution" is to add a mysterious third wheel—sorry, I mean "abstraction layer"—right smack in the middle because apparently Thing 1 and Thing 2 can't be trusted to have a healthy relationship on their own. Now instead of one chaotic mess, you've got DOUBLE the arrows, TRIPLE the complexity, and a brand new component that exists solely to play telephone between two things that were doing just fine before! But hey, at least your UML diagram looks *professional* now with all those fancy bidirectional arrows. Your professor will be SO proud. Never mind that you've just turned a 5-minute implementation into a 3-day architectural odyssey complete with interface definitions, dependency injection, and an existential crisis about whether you're solving problems or just creating job security.