One Man Show

The ultimate self-snitch! Kid tries to use ChatGPT for a Shakespeare essay, but forgets to remove the "I'm an AI language model" disclaimer. Meanwhile, teachers are panicking about AI cheating while students are literally submitting papers that start with "As an AI language model..." 🤦‍♂️ It's like showing up to rob a bank while wearing a name tag and your work uniform. The real education here isn't Shakespeare—it's learning to at least delete the first paragraph of your AI-generated homework!

When your commit history reads like a confession before execution. First you're casually doing some "AI slop" (probably copy-pasting from ChatGPT without understanding it), then comes the panic-induced "oops" commit, followed by the desperate "update gitignore" to hide the evidence of whatever catastrophe you just pushed to production. The real horror? That gitignore update should've been in the FIRST commit. Now everyone knows you either committed your API keys, pushed 500MB of node_modules, or worse—both. The fear is justified because your senior dev definitely saw this sequence and is currently drafting your performance review.

The AI gold rush in a nutshell! Companies claiming to have "built revolutionary AI products" when they're just wrapping GPT-4 in a fancy UI and calling it innovation. It's like Dave's brilliant "homemade megaphone" that's literally just... a megaphone with extra steps. The recursive definition is chef's kiss perfect—they're not creating anything new, just repackaging what already exists and slapping their logo on it. The technical term for this is "API arbitrage," but the business term is "genius" apparently.

Remember the innocent days when AI was just about identifying cats and dogs? Fast forward to now, and suddenly we're in an arms race to create sentient beings. The escalation from "look, my model can tell a golden retriever from a tabby!" to "we're literally creating consciousness before our geopolitical rivals" happened so fast I got whiplash. Venture capital really took "move fast and break things" and applied it to the fabric of existence itself. Next quarterly goal: playing God with better ROI than the competition.

The eternal standoff between designers and programmers has entered the AI era. Designers look horrified when programmers use LLMs to generate UIs, while programmers give the same judgmental side-eye when designers use AI to generate code. It's like watching two people who can't swim criticizing each other's diving form. Neither result will compile correctly, but both sides will spend hours explaining why the other's approach is worse.

First tweet: "Look at me! I built a SaaS with AI and zero coding! People actually pay for this!" Two days later: "Help! I'm being hacked! My API keys are maxed out, people are bypassing subscriptions, and my database is a dumpster fire!" The classic "I'm not technical" + "I skipped all security measures" combo strikes again. Turns out that building a product without understanding the fundamentals is like building a house with popsicle sticks—impressive until the first strong wind. Friendly reminder: AI can write your code, but it can't protect you from your own hubris. Security isn't just a vibe killer—it's actually kind of important.