CEO Of New AI Code Editor vs Actual Product

The classic "rub the lamp and make a wish" scenario, but with a programmer twist. Some poor soul wishes NVIDIA wouldn't make GPUs with 8GB VRAM, and the genie's just like "yeah... not happening." It's the digital equivalent of asking for world peace. Even supernatural beings can't convince NVIDIA to put more memory in their mid-range cards without charging you a kidney. The genie doesn't even bother offering three wishes—just straight to "hopeless" because he knows the GPU market better than anyone.

Nothing says "I'm helping" like an AI that can't even match parentheses properly. Those unbalanced brackets and braces in Google's Gemini ad are the coding equivalent of nails on a chalkboard. Sure, let the AI write your code—if you enjoy debugging cryptic syntax errors at 2AM while questioning your career choices. "Streamline your workflow" they say... more like "streamline your path to Stack Overflow." The irony of a code-generating tool that can't generate syntactically correct code in its own marketing material is just *chef's kiss*.

The great AI revolution has arrived... or has it? On the left, we have the muscular "Expectation" Doge representing those grandiose AI promises: code generators so powerful they'll make human developers obsolete! On the right, there's the pathetic "Reality" Doge – the actual AI that can't even handle a simple "Hello World" program without hallucinating semicolons. Meanwhile, executives who dumped "gazillion dollars" into AI development are frantically laying off actual programmers to cover their bad investment. Because nothing says "our AI strategy is working perfectly" like firing the people who could fix the AI's broken code. The corporate playbook never changes: overpromise, underdeliver, then blame the humans. At least the shareholders will feel better about those quarterly losses!

Ah, the eternal developer paradox. When someone shows us AI-generated code, we instantly recognize it as a tangled mess of bugs and questionable design choices. "This is brilliant," we say with thinly veiled sarcasm. But then there's our own code—equally disastrous, probably held together with duct tape and prayers—and somehow we're irrationally attached to it. "But I like this." It's like criticizing someone else's kid for being messy while your own demon spawn is literally setting the house on fire. The cognitive dissonance is strong in this profession.

Content STOP DOING AGILE • SOFTWARE WAS NOT SUPPOSED TO BE SISYPHEAN • YEARS OF PROGRAMS yet NO REAL-WORLD USE FOUND for a DAILY STANDUP • Wanted to add features anyway for a laugh? We had a tool for that: It was called "WATERFALL" • "Yes please give me UNFINISHED software. Please let me work INFINITY hours"- Statements dreamed up by the utterly Deranged LOOK at what Programmers have been demanding your Respect for all this time, with all the keyboards & mice we built for them (This is REAL Programming, done by REAL Programmers): SCRUM PROCESS ????? ????? ????????????????? "Hello I would like features please" They have played us for absolute fools

Google CEO: "30% of our code is AI generated!" Also Google: *entire cloud infrastructure collapses like a house of cards* Coincidence? I think not. Nothing says "cutting edge tech company" quite like having your AI write a third of your code while your services implode spectacularly. Maybe the AI just decided to implement that "move fast and break things" philosophy a bit too literally. Next earnings call: "We've achieved 50% AI-generated code and 100% downtime efficiency!"