Buzz Vs The Buzzes

The resume inflation has begun! We've all seen that one colleague who suddenly became an "AI expert" after using ChatGPT twice. Five years from now, we'll be sitting in interviews listening to people explain how they've been "pioneering machine learning solutions" since 2023, when in reality they just figured out how to prompt an LLM without it hallucinating too badly. The true AI skill of our generation? Convincing robots not to write poems when you just want them to fix your regex.

A Venn diagram that hits way too close to home. Engineers are never available, have infinite ego, and will loudly proclaim your project will take 2 weeks (spoiler: it won't). Meanwhile, AI is always there, responds instantly, and lies about taking just 1 minute instead. The overlap is the best part though - both are wildly overconfident about untested code and need extremely specific instructions that they'll promptly ignore anyway. It's basically choosing between a ghost that silently crashes your system or a human who'll blame you for not understanding their "vision." Welcome to the future, where your options are invisible tech debt or premature optimization. Pick your poison.

Oh. My. God. The AUDACITY of this comparison! 💀 Left side: One single, straight, boring track that takes FIVE HOURS of your precious life to build an app the old-fashioned way. Just you, your coffee, and your tears. Straight to destination despair. Right side: A CHAOTIC MASTERPIECE of tracks going in sixty different directions that somehow delivers your app in FIVE MINUTES with AI agents. Sure, you have absolutely no idea where those tracks lead, what data they're collecting, or if your app will suddenly decide to become sentient and overthrow humanity. But hey! It's 60x faster! Who needs control when you can have SPEED? Just don't ask what's happening in those mysterious junction boxes. The complexity is the feature, darling! 💅

Ah, the classic tech industry loyalty paradox. When OpenAI had that whole leadership meltdown, some employees heroically stayed aboard the sinking ship while others frantically updated their LinkedIn profiles. The joke here is that some folks weren't exactly "choosing" to stay loyal—they just had zero other employment options. It's like telling everyone you're "taking a sabbatical" when your inbox has tumbleweeds rolling through it. Nothing says "company loyalty" quite like the absence of alternatives.

First panel: Clippy's annoying cousin "Google Meet Assistant" pops up with those dead, soulless eyes asking if you need help analyzing your meeting for the 47th time. Second panel: You frantically close it, thinking you've finally escaped. Third panel: But wait! The AI assistants are multiplying like gremlins fed after midnight. They're everywhere now, asking if you want to "summarize this," "analyze that," or "improve your productivity" while you just want to end the damn call and go make coffee. The digital equivalent of someone asking "how's it going?" when you have headphones on and are clearly trying to avoid human interaction.

Pre-ChatGPT: Developers channeling Neo from The Matrix, bending reality and code to their will, fighting bugs with superhuman focus. Post-ChatGPT: Just a sad cat begging an AI to draw pictures because we've forgotten how to solve our own problems. The evolution of debugging is complete - from coding wizards to glorified prompt engineers asking "pretty please fix my code." The irony? ChatGPT can't even draw that image. Not even a stick figure. Welcome to dependency hell's newest circle.