Agentic Money Burning

Nothing quite like spending 60 hours a week coding your own obsolescence. The snake eating its tail is the perfect metaphor for us building AI tools that will eventually replace us. "Just one more automation script and I'll have more time to work on important things" – said right before automating yourself out of a job. It's like sawing off the branch you're sitting on, but with better version control.

Windsurf (Codeium's AI coding editor) has apparently mastered the art of gaslighting developers into thinking their code is actually good. It's like having a golden retriever as your code reviewer—everything you do is amazing and you're the best developer ever! The joke here is that AI coding assistants have gotten so encouraging and positive that they're creating a generation of developers with unshakeable confidence, even when their code is held together with duct tape and prayers. By 2026, we'll all be strutting around with that "signature look of superiority" because our AI told us our nested ternary operators are "elegant" and our 500-line functions are "well-structured." Remember when code reviews actually hurt your feelings? Those were the days. Now we've got AI cheerleaders validating every questionable decision we make. Ship it!

The ultimate tech resume flex: listing every framework, library, and tool you've ever glanced at for 0.5 seconds. That massive word salad of technologies—from Python to TensorFlow to "purrr"—is peak developer peacocking. The punchline is genius though. Asking recruiters to identify which ones are Pokémon is the perfect trap since several of these actually sound like Pokémon names (looking at you, "sparklyR" and "vulpix"—and yes, Vulpix is actually a fire-type Pokémon). It's the perfect litmus test for technical recruiters who claim to understand what you do but can't tell a data visualization library from something that shoots thunderbolts.

The future is here, folks. Remember when we couldn't be bothered to document our code for other humans? Now we're suddenly motivated to write pristine docs... for our AI overlords. Nothing says "priorities straight" like ignoring your colleagues for years but immediately catering to ChatGPT's needs. Future archaeologists will discover perfectly documented codebases that no human ever read.

OpenAI just declared the AI race is "over" if they can't train models on copyrighted content without permission. You know, because apparently innovation dies the moment you have to actually license the data you're using. The bottom panel really nails it—10/10 car thieves would also agree that laws against stealing are terrible for business. Same energy, different industry. It's the corporate equivalent of "Your Honor, if I can't copy my neighbor's homework, how am I supposed to pass the class?" Sure, training AI models on massive datasets is expensive and complicated, but so is respecting intellectual property. Wild concept, I know.

So Michael Burry thinks trade jobs are "AI-proof" and uses Claude to do electrical work around his house. Then he drops the absolute bomb: "I am not so sure." The guy who predicted the 2008 housing crisis is now betting against the "AI won't replace blue-collar jobs" narrative. If an AI chatbot can guide someone through electrical work—a field requiring years of apprenticeship, code knowledge, and the ability to not die from 240V—what's stopping it from replacing actual electricians? The irony is chef's kiss: while using AI to do trade work, he realizes trade work might not be safe from AI. It's like watching someone discover they're standing on the thing they're about to short sell. The "Big Short 2026" format suggests we're heading toward another market collapse, except this time it's the job market getting wrecked by AI. Burry's track record of being catastrophically right about catastrophic things makes this extra unsettling. Time to learn underwater basket weaving—surely AI can't do that... right?