Every New Project Be Like...

That suspicious feeling when your "agile" manager schedules the fifth standup of the week to "check on your progress." Sure, the Scrum board says we're doing sprints, but somehow we're also doing daily code reviews, hourly updates, and mandatory "quick sync" meetings that last 2 hours. Nothing says "I trust my developers" like asking for a detailed breakdown of how you spent each 15-minute block of your day. The best part? They'll call it "removing impediments" while being the biggest impediment themselves.

Developer: "The interface is super intuitive." Meanwhile, the user is trying to enter the doghouse through the roof because nobody bothered with a user manual or tooltips. Happens every sprint when UX design is an afterthought and the PM is breathing down your neck about deadlines. The real intuitive interface was the friends we confused along the way.

Ah, the sacred corporate hierarchy in action. VP of Sales mutters something about a feature, and suddenly the entire dev roadmap gets thrown out the window. Never mind the months of planning, user research, or that critical security patch—some executive who just returned from a golf outing with a prospect has spoken. The PM's face says it all: dead inside but still professionally nodding. This is why we drink.

OH. MY. GOD. This is the filthiest thing I've seen since someone used tabs instead of spaces! 💅 AgentPorn.ai isn't your average sketchy website - it's a DEVELOPER'S GUILTY PLEASURE with categories that make me CLUTCH MY PEARLS! "Zero Downtime"? "Wet Deployments"?? "BARELY LEGAL REGEX"??? 😱 The way they've turned mundane development tasks into suggestive clickbait is SENDING ME! And that "NSFW: Not Safe For Waterfall" warning? Honey, Agile developers are LIVING for this drama! The build success with "420/420" tests passed? That's not just code, that's a LIFESTYLE CHOICE! This is basically developer thirst traps but for people who get excited about CI/CD pipelines and perfect uptime metrics. I'm simultaneously horrified and bookmarking it.

The four stages of developer evolution, beautifully depicted as increasingly unhinged clown makeup: Stage 1: The innocent belief your code is "good and understandable" because your colleagues said so. Bless your heart. Stage 2: The realization that clean code belongs in textbooks, not production. In the real world, that pristine architecture just slows down delivery. Stage 3: The existential crisis when you discover those elegant abstractions you spent weeks on are worthless after the first requirement change. Stage 4: The final form - admitting you never formally studied programming while your codebase burns in the background. Yet somehow, the system still runs. And that's how we all end up maintaining legacy code written by circus performers.

HR: "Do you work in Agile?" Developers everywhere: *silent screaming* The truth hits harder than a failed production deployment at 4:59 PM on Friday. Whether you choose Waterfall (one big sequential pile of 💩) or Agile (the same pile, just broken into multiple sprints of 💩), you're still dealing with... well, you know. The only real difference? In Agile, you get to experience the disappointment in two-week increments instead of all at once. It's like choosing between getting punched once really hard or getting slapped repeatedly for eternity. Such innovation. Much methodology.