Average AI User Behavior

Average AI User Behavior
The modern developer's workflow in a nutshell: Why spend 5 minutes thinking through a problem when you can spend 30 seconds asking ChatGPT and another 2 hours debugging the confidently incorrect code it gave you? The Drake meme perfectly captures how we've collectively decided that critical thinking is now optional. Need to implement a binary search tree? Could think about the logic... or just paste the AI's solution straight into production and hope the stack traces are merciful. Bonus points if you don't even read the AI's response before hitting copy-paste. It's like Russian roulette, but with more memory leaks and undefined behavior.

🥹 Cries

🥹Cries
Job posting: "Fast-paced and exciting!" Translation: You'll be trapped in a beige cubicle prison that makes solitary confinement look like a tropical vacation. The "excitement" is watching the same beige walls close in on you while you contemplate your life choices. The "fast pace" refers to how quickly your soul drains out of your body with each passing hour. That single monitor from 2007? That's your window to the world now. The thrilling phone calls? Probably just IT telling you to restart your computer. Again. The only thing moving fast here is your motivation—straight out the door.

Pycharm Or Spooky Graveyard

Pycharm Or Spooky Graveyard
PyCharm's "Updating skeletons..." message has a double meaning that's genuinely hilarious. The IDE is literally updating Python type stubs (called skeletons), but it also feels like you're watching your productivity slowly die while waiting for it to finish. The skeleton raising its hands in celebration perfectly captures that moment when you're just sitting there, completely helpless, watching the progress bar crawl along. Can't code, can't do anything—just vibing with the dead while PyCharm does its thing. At least it's not indexing... right?

The Oddly Specific Documentationless Magic Number

The Oddly Specific Documentationless Magic Number
You know you're in deep when someone asks about that random if (count > 37) sitting in the codebase like an ancient artifact. "Historical reasons" is developer-speak for "I have absolutely no idea why this exists, the person who wrote it left the company 5 years ago, and I'm too terrified to touch it because production hasn't exploded yet." That nervous side-eye says it all. Why 37? Why not 36 or 38? Was it a business requirement? A bug fix? Someone's lucky number? The universe may never know. The comment "nobody knows why 37" is both brutally honest and professionally devastating. It's the coding equivalent of archaeological mystery—except instead of ancient civilizations, it's just Dave from 2015 who didn't believe in documentation. Pro tip: If you ever find yourself writing code with magic numbers, leave a comment. Future you (or the poor soul who inherits your code) will thank you. Or at least won't curse your name during 3 AM debugging sessions.

N O! 2026 Ha S T O B E Th E Y Ea R O F L In Ux!!1!

N O! 2026 Ha S T O B E Th E Y Ea R O F L In Ux!!1!
Every. Single. Year. Since the early 2000s, Linux enthusiasts have been screaming from the rooftops that THIS is the year Linux will finally dominate the desktop market and dethrone Windows. Spoiler alert: it's been over two decades of the same prophecy, and Windows is still sitting pretty on like 75% of desktops while Linux hovers around 3%. But do Linux fanboys give up? ABSOLUTELY NOT. They'll read that book of broken promises, get FURIOUS at the audacity of reality, and immediately declare that 2026 (or 2027, or 2028...) will DEFINITELY be the chosen year. The denial is so strong you could power a server farm with it. Meanwhile, Linux continues to quietly dominate servers, supercomputers, and Android devices, but nope—desktop supremacy or bust!

New Age Slop C

New Age Slop C
Dennis Ritchie invented C in 1972. Anders Hejlsberg invented C# in 2000. Now some random guy with a webcam and a dream invented "C~slop" in 2026. The natural evolution of programming languages, really. From foundational systems programming to enterprise-friendly managed code to... whatever AI-generated fever dream we're about to endure. The progression of facial expressions tells you everything you need to know. Ritchie looks dignified and accomplished. Hejlsberg looks professional and pleased with his work. Random webcam guy looks like he just discovered he can prompt ChatGPT to write an entire programming language and is way too excited about it. Can't wait for the Hacker News thread where people debate whether C~slop is "production ready."

Chernobyl At Home

Chernobyl At Home
When you ask how to reduce RGB light intensity and someone suggests just removing the blue and green values. Congratulations, you've turned your gaming setup into a nuclear reactor core. That ominous red glow isn't ambiance—it's a radiation warning. Setting RGB to (255, 0, 0) doesn't reduce light, it just makes everything look like you're developing photos in a darkroom or about to launch missiles. Your room now has the same energy as Reactor 4 right before things went sideways. At least your electricity bill matches the vibes. Pro tip: reducing RGB light means lowering the overall brightness values, not creating a monochromatic hellscape. Try (50, 50, 50) instead of becoming a supervillain.

We Still Talk About You jQuery

We Still Talk About You jQuery
jQuery is basically the ex that everyone still brings up at parties. Once the king of DOM manipulation and AJAX calls, jQuery made web development bearable back when Internet Explorer 6 was still haunting our nightmares. But now? It's buried six feet under, replaced by modern frameworks like React, Vue, and vanilla JavaScript that can actually do what jQuery did natively. The thing is, we can't stop talking about it. Every "modern web dev" discussion somehow circles back to "remember when we needed jQuery for everything?" It's like that one friend from high school who peaked early—we've all moved on, but the memories (and the legacy codebases) remain. Somewhere out there, a dusty WordPress site is still running jQuery 1.4.2, and honestly? It's probably fine.

I Just Can't Prove It

I Just Can't Prove It
When your portfolio claims "full stack web app with backend" but the entire backend is literally just two Express routes copy-pasted from Stack Overflow and a JSON file pretending to be a database. Sure, it technically has a backend... in the same way a cardboard cutout technically has depth. The "No AI" disclaimer is the cherry on top—gotta make sure everyone knows you typed those two commits yourself, even if one of them was just fixing a typo in the README.

Algorithm The Saviour

Algorithm The Saviour
You know you've hit peak laziness when "I used an algorithm" becomes your universal escape hatch. Can't explain your nested loops? Algorithm. Don't remember why you chose that data structure? Algorithm. Someone asks why your function has 47 lines of incomprehensible logic? Just smile and say "it's an algorithm" like you're dropping some CS theory knowledge. It's the technical equivalent of saying "it's magic" but with enough gravitas that people nod and back away slowly. Works especially well in code reviews when you really just brute-forced something at 2 AM and have zero idea how to articulate the chaos you created.

I Got Your Monitors Missing 0.01 Hz And I'm Not Giving It Back

I Got Your Monitors Missing 0.01 Hz And I'm Not Giving It Back
You know that feeling when you set up dual monitors and one is running at 200.01 Hz while the other is stuck at 200.00 Hz? Yeah, the GPU is basically holding that extra 0.01 Hz hostage. It's like having two perfectly matched monitors, same model, same specs, bought on the same day... and somehow the universe decided one deserves slightly more refresh rate than the other. The NVIDIA driver just sits there smugly, refusing to sync them up. You'll spend 45 minutes in display settings trying to manually set them to match, only to realize the option simply doesn't exist. That 0.01 Hz difference? It's the GPU's now. Consider it rent for using dual monitors. And yes, you absolutely WILL notice the difference. Or at least you'll convince yourself you do.

New AI Engineers

New AI Engineers
Someone discovered you can skip the entire computer science curriculum by copy-pasting transformer code from Hugging Face. Why waste years learning Python, data structures, algorithms, discrete math, calculus, and statistics when you can just import a pre-trained model and call it "AI engineering"? The escalator labeled "attention is all you need" (referencing the famous transformer paper) goes straight to the top while the stairs gather dust. Turns out the only prerequisite for a six-figure AI job is knowing how to pip install and having the confidence to say "I fine-tuned a model" in interviews.