Every Senior Dev's Personal Website

Frontend devs mock backend folks for using plain JavaScript instead of the framework-du-jour, but secretly, we all know those vanilla JS backends have been running flawlessly for years while the frontend stack has been rewritten 17 times. That backend code written in 2014? Still chugging along without a hiccup. Meanwhile, the frontend team is busy migrating from React to Vue to Svelte to whatever shiny new framework dropped last Tuesday. Sometimes boring technology is the most reliable. And deep down, we're all a little jealous of that stability.

The sacred relationship between a developer and their IDE of choice. After years of customizing shortcuts, plugins, and themes until it's barely recognizable, you'd sooner switch careers than text editors. That "Pin to taskbar" option is basically a marriage proposal. The rest are just temporary flings you use when your main IDE crashes.

The journey from happy coding to existential crisis in 0.2 seconds. That missing curly brace on line 265 turned our man from "Yeah, I got this!" to "Why did I choose this career?" faster than you can say "syntax error." Eight years of experience and I still stare at my screen like that when the compiler throws a fit over a single character. The best part? You'll spend 45 minutes hunting it down only to feel like an absolute genius when you fix it with a single keystroke.

The ultimate comparison between gambling and the AI-powered "vibe coding" trend that's sweeping through dev circles! Just like slot machines are designed to keep you hooked with intermittent rewards, prompt engineering has you constantly tweaking text inputs hoping for that magical output. The parallels are uncanny - from buying tokens instead of chips (OpenAI's API isn't cheap!), to the false promise of "one more prompt" fixing everything. My favorite line: "The Cursor is always in profit" - a brilliant wordplay on the AI coding assistant and the house always winning. That final realization hits hard: "Wait, did I just spend 4 hours writing prompts for a function I could've written in 20 minutes?" The dopamine-driven cycle of AI dependency in a nutshell. Maybe we should call it "gambling-driven development"!

The truth bomb that launched a thousand uncomfortable laughs at a dev conference. Nothing says "modern web development" like creating 47MB of JavaScript dependencies to avoid writing display: flex; justify-content: center; . Meanwhile, the audience is divided between those nodding in agreement and those who just published their "Revolutionary CSS-in-JS Solution" on GitHub yesterday. The irony of someone presenting this while probably using a JS framework to power their slides is just *chef's kiss*.

The great developer migration of 2023 visualized. Massive crowd flocking to ChatGPT while one lonely soul still visits Stack Overflow. Remember when we had to actually read through 15 answers, each starting with "Actually, you shouldn't do it that way" before finding a solution that worked? Now we just ask the AI and get code that's wrong in exciting new ways instead of the familiar old ways. Progress!