My Friend Told Me She Loves TypeScript

The eternal dance of trying to type return while Intellisense watches your every keystroke like a hawk. You start with re , thinking you're on the right track, then add tu and rn ... but that final keystroke? That's where dreams die. One misplaced finger and suddenly you're not exiting a function—you're apparently opening a RestaurantMenu class that you didn't even know existed in your codebase. The sheer joy on Intellisense's face (right side) compared to your growing frustration (left side) perfectly captures that moment when your IDE decides it knows better than you what you're trying to type. And of course, it's always when you're in a hurry or showing code to someone else that your IDE decides to showcase its comedic timing.

Content Follow Princioa Consultant Software Architect Team Leader S 30 a Forens S What Are the Greenest Programming Languages: This paper presents a study of the runtime, memory usage, and energy consumotion of twentvseven welcknown sottware lanGuages. We monitor the perormance or such languages using ten cnnerencorograminino problems, expressed in each of the languages. Our results show interesting findings, such as slower faster languages consuming less more energy, and now memo usage marlences enero consumotion. we show now to use ou results to provide software engineers support to decide which language to use when energy efficiency is a concern This study implemented 10 benchmark problems in 27 different programming languages and measure execution time, energy consumption, and peak memo use C is the most efficient programming language, while Python and Perl are the least environmental friendly programming languages Link: https:Inkd.indnyrcdGd engineers programming sottware language energy sustainabilty (c) C (c) Rust (c) C (c) Ada (v) Java (c) Pascal (c) Chapel (v) Lisp (c) Ocaml (c) Fortran (c) Swift (c) Haskell (v) C (c) Go (G) Dart (v) F (i) JavaScript (v) Racket (i) TypeScript (i Hack (i) PHP (y) Erlang (i) Lua (i) Jruby (a) Ruby (i) Python ( Perl Energy 1.00 1.03 1.34 1.70 1.98 2.14 2.18 2.27 2.40 2.52 2.79 3.10 3.14 3.23 3.83 4.13 4.45 7.91 21.50 24.02 29.30 42.23 45.98 46.54 69.91 75.88 79.58 C0 Venkatesh Madi and 4.999 others 397 comments

The eternal battle between proper type declaration and chaotic brevity. Top panel shows the responsible adult way with let a: String - explicit, clear, and following best practices. Bottom panel shows what we actually do: String a - because who has time for those extra keystrokes when there's a deadline in 20 minutes and you're already on your fifth coffee? Type inference exists for a reason, and that reason is pure laziness disguised as "efficiency."

Content HTML CSS JavaScript React C C Swift Ruby PHP JQuery Python TypeScript Java codes.learning Learn to Code - For Structure. - For Style. - For Fun. - For Work. For Dinosaurs. - For Dinosaurs. - For Games. - For Ul. - For Rails. For - For Legacy - For Science - For Safety For DATA STRUCTURES GET FREE CERTIFICATION COURSES KNOWLEDGE JOIN OUR TELEGRAM CHANNEL LINK IN BIC

Ah, JavaScript - where "11" + 1 equals "111" but "11" - 1 equals 10. The language where type coercion is less of a feature and more of a practical joke played by sadistic language designers. The character's enthusiasm quickly evaporates when confronted with JavaScript's notorious string concatenation vs. numeric operation behavior. And lurking in the shadows? TypeScript, silently judging, ready to save us from ourselves with its static typing. It's like having a designated driver when the rest of us are drunk on dynamic typing.

The existential crisis every developer faces at 2 AM while debugging. We name something a "variable" and then immediately declare it as "const" or "final" or "readonly" - essentially telling it not to vary. The cognitive dissonance is real! It's like naming your pet rock "Runner" or your cactus "Cuddles." No wonder our code gets confused and throws exceptions - we've been gaslighting our variables this whole time!