The Art Of "Fixing" Lint Errors

Ah, the classic CSS battle against invisible elements. Setting z-index to 99999 is basically the frontend equivalent of yelling "COME OUT, I KNOW YOU'RE IN THERE!" at your monitor. Meanwhile, your div is probably hiding behind another element with position: relative that you forgot about three hours ago. The true villain isn't the z-index—it's the CSS stacking context that silently judges your desperate attempts at bringing elements forward. After eight years of frontend development, I've learned that no matter how big your z-index number is, there's always some parent container laughing at your pathetic attempts to control the layout.

Content NYPD TYPESCRIPT CHOOSING ESLINT AS DEVDEPENDENCY ESLINT CHOOSING TYPESCRIPT AS DEVDEPENDENGY

Content Thomas "Kick Nazis out, jack" Fu... thomastuchs Follow Here we see a react engineer deploying a contact form BAUMANN 6:14 PM - 9 Nov 2017 1,991 Retweets 4,659 Likes 51 17 2.0K 4.7K

That moment when your trendy "vibe coder" with their bootcamp certificate and chicken hat finally meets production code. The senior dev just watching as reality hits harder than a merge conflict on Friday afternoon. Three eggs on the floor already—each one a failed deployment. The chicken's like "You said you knew JavaScript?" and the dog's just sitting there with that thousand-yard stare that screams "I have no idea what I'm doing but I'm in too deep to admit it now."

Content JavaScript criticism on Twitter be like: "a" in "a", "b" is false, what a stupid language!

The evolution of dependency management excuses is just *chef's kiss*. First we pretend it's a calculated technical decision. Then we admit we're just lazy. But that final panel? Pure gold. "LLMs don't understand it yet" is the new "works on my machine." Nothing like blaming AI for your technical debt while your package.json looks like a digital archaeological dig site. Meanwhile, your junior dev is quietly running "npm audit fix" in production.