The New Feature Has Zero Bugs

Content Q: When I was 4, my sister was 2. 1 am now 44. How old is my sister? Programmer: 44 - (4 - 2) 42 Tester: When I was 4, my sister was 2. I am now 44. How old is my sister? "As Answer a) Follow 97 Request 01 S 000 100 Answers Samuel Lipoff, studied at Harvard University Updated 17h ago This is a tough one. She might be 42, but she could be 41 or 43 also, since you don't say when your birthday is and her birthday is. Also, she could be dead. Finally, you might have thought she was your sister but actually your mom had an affair with another man and the woman who is 1-3 years younger than you is not actually your sister. But your mom may have given away your real sister for adoption, in which case she's probably older than you. See why it's tough? Finally, what if you think your sister is dead, but she actually has become an astronaut on a secret government project for near light-speed travel? Then your sister would be aging more slowly than you, so she could potentially be even younger than 41

Content When you recompile your code for the 74th time and you finally get a different error I see this as an absolute win! FrocTammeTsu

THE ABSOLUTE AUDACITY of software! One second it's having a full-blown meltdown, crashing, freezing, and practically setting your computer on fire. Then the MILLISECOND you open Task Manager to end its miserable existence, it's suddenly performing like it just came back from a spa retreat! 💅 It's like that friend who's "too sick" to help you move but miraculously recovers when there's free pizza. The digital equivalent of a toddler behaving perfectly the moment grandma walks in. I'm convinced our programs have tiny digital eyes watching our every mouse movement, ready to get their act together at the first sign of consequences!

Oh. My. GAWD! 😂 The absolute AUDACITY of developers who think they can just slap a unit test on their function and strut around like they've achieved 100% test coverage! HONEY, PLEASE! That smug smile when you've tested your function in isolation while completely ignoring how it interacts with literally EVERYTHING ELSE is just... *chef's kiss* delusional! It's like putting a seatbelt on a car with no brakes and declaring it "totally safe" – the confidence is SENDING ME! Your function might work perfectly in your little test bubble, but throw it into production and watch the whole system COLLAPSE like my will to live during a 3 AM debugging session!

OH. MY. GOD. The absolute AUDACITY of this poor game dev! 😱 Released a $2 game that's basically a digital dumpster fire with more bugs than features, and then has the NERVE to stand there like "this is fine" while Steam reviews are burning the game to the ground! 🔥 The game's so unfinished it has achievements for content that doesn't exist, difficulty levels that aren't implemented, and balance issues that would make a see-saw with an elephant on one end look stable! And yet there they stand, wrapped in their Dark Souls cosplay, completely oblivious to the catastrophe they've unleashed upon humanity! The best part? The "$2 game" caption at the bottom - as if the price somehow excuses shipping what's essentially a beta labeled as a full release. Honey, even at $2, players expect a GAME, not a collection of broken promises with a Steam page! 💅

Content That one facebook intern that pushed the code into production realization