YouTube's Selective Enforcement Policy

The grumpy tech veteran's manifesto has arrived! This is basically what happens when someone who's written actual production code for a decade watches the latest batch of "I built a startup with no-code tools and vibes" TikToks. The screenshots are pure gold - one poor soul storing passwords in a CSV file (security professionals just felt a disturbance in the force), while another "SaaS founder" is shocked that people are actually using their API in ways they didn't anticipate. Revolutionary! And that emoji-based developer bio at the bottom? Chef's kiss. Nothing says "I definitely know what I'm doing" like introducing yourself with three random tech logos instead of, you know, actual skills. Ten years ago we called these people "script kiddies." Now they're "founders" with 50K Twitter followers explaining why your engineering team is doing it wrong.

The ultimate nightmare for any developer - a warning about a virus that puts clown emojis between everything you type... which is exactly what happens when you try those "no-code" solutions to push straight to production. Sure, they promise riches and simplicity, but what you really get is a circus. Just like how your manager thinks deploying to prod without proper testing is a brilliant shortcut, only to turn your codebase into a carnival of horrors. The irony is *chef's kiss* - the message itself demonstrates the very chaos it warns against!

Oh snap! This is the perfect metaphor for those sketchy "FREE GIFT" popups that naive users see on the surface, while underneath lurks an army of hackers ready to steal your data! It's like when your non-tech friend clicks that flashy "YOU WON AN IPHONE" banner and you just facepalm so hard you bruise your forehead. The digital equivalent of "there's no such thing as a free lunch" – except the lunch steals your credit card and sets your identity on fire. 🔥

Remember the first rule of memory safety is to have fun! Ah yes, nothing says "fun" like a malloc() function that completely ignores your size parameter and just returns a random memory address. Because who needs memory management when you can have chaos ? This is basically the programming equivalent of asking for a specific room in a hotel and the receptionist blindfolding themselves, spinning around, and throwing your key card somewhere in the general vicinity of the building. Your program isn't crashing, it's just playing an exciting game of "where the heck is my data?" every time you run it. Memory corruption roulette - the game where everyone loses, especially your users!

The classic tale of confidence meeting reality. First panel: Developer riding high on vibes, claiming they can do anything. Second panel: Someone asks about fixing actual technical issues. Third and fourth panels: Developer's face transitions from "I'm a genius" to "I want to murder you for exposing my incompetence." This is the programming equivalent of saying you're fluent in French until someone actually speaks French to you. The "vibe coder" is that person who copies Stack Overflow solutions without understanding them, then gets defensive when asked to explain why their code works (or more likely, why it doesn't).

Ah, the great language wars continue. Rust evangelists love to preach about memory safety while conveniently ignoring that you basically have to type "unsafe" every time you need to do anything actually useful. It's like having a car with 15 seatbelts but you have to unbuckle them all just to reach the gas pedal. The irony is delicious - a language designed for safety that forces you to explicitly opt out of that safety to get real work done. Reminds me of that coworker who lectures everyone about clean code but has a "temporary" folder with 5 years of hacks.