What's Stopping Your Codebase From Looking Like This

The padlock is technically locked... if you ignore the fact that it's completely bypassing the actual mechanism. Just like your code that passes all tests while violating every principle in the documentation. Security through obscurity at its finest. The best part? You'll be the one on call when it inevitably breaks at 2am on a Saturday.

The classic security theater of development. Two door handles secured by a padlock that's completely bypassing the actual locking mechanism. Sure, it looks secure to management walking by, much like that code you cobbled together from Stack Overflow snippets without reading a single line of documentation. Is it actually secure? Absolutely not. Will it pass code review? Somehow, yes. Just don't touch it or breathe near it - that's how production incidents are born.

Remember when hackers had to actually know things ? The big brain hacker of yesteryear reverse engineered binaries, wrote zines with 0day exploits, and gained root access just for the intellectual thrill. Fast forward to today, and we've got script kiddies drooling over their keyboards while Metasploit does all the work with a single command. For the uninitiated, Metasploit is basically the "I'm a hacker" starter pack that automates exploits so anyone can feel like Mr. Robot without understanding what's happening under the hood. It's like comparing someone who builds a car from scratch to someone who thinks they're a mechanic because they can turn the key. The future of hacking? Probably just asking ChatGPT to "do a hack please" while eating Cheetos.

When the dev who built your UI validation thought phone numbers were just decorative elements. Somewhere out there, a database is screaming as it stores "74626282613" with no country code, formatting, or validation whatsoever. The slider is a particularly nice touch - nothing says "professional application" like measuring phone digits on a scale from "not enough" to "way too many."

The tech workplace hierarchy decoded in grid form! Each IT role has their own unique perception of colleagues, ranging from admiration to outright hostility. Developers see designers as children, while security views everyone as potential threats. QA's perspective is particularly brutal—seeing developers as headache-inducing and project managers as chaotic mobs. The most accurate row might be the sysadmins, who apparently view security folks as actual traffic cops stopping everything. It's basically a documented proof that we're all silently judging each other while pretending to collaborate. The cross-functional team meeting just got awkwardly real.

The eternal struggle of a developer's brain refusing to shut down at bedtime. Just as you're drifting off to sleep, your brain hits you with the impossible dream: "What if there was a GitHub list of GDPR-compliant EU companies that actually respect privacy?" Your brain knows full well this mythical collection is as rare as bug-free code on the first commit. The wide-eyed stare in the final panel perfectly captures that moment when you realize you'll be debugging this thought until 4 AM instead of sleeping. Finding ethical tech companies is like searching for proper documentation – theoretically possible but practically nonexistent.