The Cake Is A Lie

When Google asks for a "strong password," and you take it literally with HTML tags. Technically correct—the best kind of correct. The password field contains <strong><h1>Password</h1></strong> which is indeed a very "strong" password according to HTML semantics. Security experts hate this one weird trick.

The paranoid tech veteran's approach to data security: physically removing the hard drive platters. Sure, you could use DBAN or a hammer, but where's the satisfaction in that? This is like bringing a tactical nuke to a knife fight—complete overkill that would make any security auditor simultaneously applaud and facepalm. For the uninitiated, those metal discs (platters) are where your embarrassing browser history and collection of half-finished side projects actually live. No platters = no evidence of that framework you started building in 2018 and abandoned after three commits. Bonus points for the "I was bored" justification—the universal explanation for both brilliant engineering solutions and catastrophic tech disasters since the dawn of computing.

Oh. My. GOD. The AUDACITY of putting a "DO NOT CONNECT TO LAN/INTERNET" sticker with a skull and crossbones on a laptop that LITERALLY HAS AN ETHERNET PORT RIGHT BELOW IT! It's like putting a "do not eat" sign on a cake and then serving it with a fork! This is the digital equivalent of telling someone they can't swim while pushing them into a pool. Some poor IT admin is having heart palpitations somewhere knowing that temptation is just ONE cable away from complete and utter catastrophe! That laptop must be harboring government secrets or the world's most embarrassing browser history! 💀

Ah, the classic "2TB for $7" eBay special! What we're seeing here is the digital equivalent of buying a "Rolax" watch from a guy in an alley. The VP's bargain USB drive claims to be 2.1TB but the validation software reveals it's actually 7.3GB - about 0.35% of the advertised capacity. These scam drives are modified to report a fake capacity to your computer while actually containing a fraction of the storage. They'll happily let you "save" files beyond their real capacity, but those files just vanish into the digital void. Like trying to pour a gallon of water into a shot glass and wondering where it all went. Nothing quite says "executive decision-making" like a VP who thinks storage technology follows the same pricing model as ramen noodles. At least the validation software delivered the bad news before any important company files went to digital heaven!

When security meets bureaucracy, innovation happens! The boss wants to secure packages against supply chain attacks, and everyone's got ideas: raise awareness, use AI scanning, require 2FA from multiple devs. But that one guy takes it to the next level with "4FA" - and gets promptly defenestrated for his brilliance. For the uninitiated, 2FA (Two-Factor Authentication) is already a pain for most developers. Suggesting 4FA is like proposing we solve traffic jams by adding more lanes to highways - technically logical but practically homicidal.

You type your password carefully the first time - wrong. You type it even more carefully the second time - still wrong. By the third try, you're meticulously pecking each key like you're defusing a bomb. Meanwhile, the website's code is sitting there like: "Oh, you typed that password too quickly? Must be a bot. REJECTED!" Seven years of development experience and I still can't convince a login form I'm human. Next they'll ask me to identify traffic lights in blurry images while standing on one foot and reciting pi to 100 digits.