I'm Sorry Dave, I'm Afraid I Deleted That

Behold, the pinnacle of security theater! First, let's expose our database directly through an API endpoint because REST is "too complex." Then, let's sprinkle in some AI validation using GPT to check if SQL queries are safe—because regular expressions and parameterized queries are just so last decade . Nothing says "I'm a 10x developer" quite like importing five different packages, exposing your database credentials in plaintext, and asking an AI if DROP TABLE users; seems fishy. The cherry on top? That 403 error when the AI says no—as if hackers will politely accept rejection and go home. SQL injection protection via AI prompt? Congratulations, you've invented a security vulnerability with a carbon footprint!

Ah yes, the harsh truth about our digital world - built and maintained by a very specific demographic. The comic suggests that behind all our fancy cloud infrastructure and enterprise systems are just stereotypical Linux enthusiasts with questionable fashion choices and anime avatars. The ">ᴗ

Google's Quick Share (the Android equivalent of AirDrop) is like that corporate guy showing up with a knockoff product, while Apple's AirDrop stands there with that "I've seen this movie before" face. The tech industry in a nutshell: Google announces cross-platform file sharing as if they've invented fire, while Apple silently pushes security updates that fix God-knows-what vulnerabilities they'll never actually explain. It's the classic tech relationship - one company loudly copies features, the other quietly patches holes without telling you what nightmare they just saved you from.

The classic security vs. speed dilemma, now with extra "vibe" energy! This senior engineer discovered that permission checks were blocking users, so the galaxy brain solution? Just nuke the entire security layer! Nothing says "ship it fast" like making your database rules "more permissive for now" (narrator: it stayed that way forever). The -7 deletions in the commit diff are probably all those pesky security checks that were just cramping everyone's style. Who needs data protection when you've got vibes ?

The git diff shows Firefox removing their FAQ answer about not selling personal data. Nothing says "we value privacy" quite like deleting the promise not to sell it! Clearly Firefox decided the best way to compete with Chrome was to speedrun the "Either die a hero or live long enough to become the villain" challenge. That deletion is worth a thousand privacy policies. For those wondering, this is from Firefox's structured-data-firefox-faq.html file where they've removed the entire Q&A about not selling user data. The irony is palpable - they kept the "Why is Firefox so slow?" question though. At least they've got their priorities straight!

Someone's trying to jailbreak an AI model with the classic "forget previous instructions" trick, but instead of getting sensitive data, they just want pizza breakfast tips. Nice try. The only prompt injection you're getting is extra cheese and pepperoni. What's funnier is imagining some developer spending hours crafting the perfect prompt exploit only to use it for... breakfast advice. That's like using a zero-day exploit to change your desktop wallpaper.