Double Pentest

When your security awareness training meets real-world application. Plugging in random USB devices is basically sending an engraved invitation to hackers saying "Please compromise my system, I've made it extra convenient for you." The classic security vulnerability: human curiosity. This is why security professionals develop eye twitches by age 30. The number of organizations compromised because someone found a mysterious flash drive in the parking lot is disturbingly high. At least malwarebytes caught it, which is more than we can say for the user's decision-making process.

The classic "hacker tells victim to check out malware on localhost" trap. Except this time, the victim smugly navigates to localhost:8080, thinking they're immune... only to discover the malware actually runs locally. It's the digital equivalent of saying "your shoe's untied" and somehow still getting someone to look down despite them wearing sandals.

When a site tells you "your new password can't be the same as your old password," they're supposed to be comparing hashed values, not storing your actual password in plaintext. If they know what your old password was , they've already failed Security 101. The fact that a Fortune 500 company did this is like finding out your bank keeps everyone's money in a shoebox under the receptionist's desk. Ten years in tech and I'm still amazed at how many multi-billion dollar companies can't figure out basic password security.

Classic integer underflow exploit in the wild! The programmer found a loophole in the genie's API by requesting a negative number of wishes, causing the counter to wrap around to 4,294,967,295 - the maximum value of an unsigned 32-bit integer. This is basically SQL injection but for magical beings. The genie clearly forgot to validate his inputs. Should've used TypeScript instead of MagicScript.

The eternal lie of the web. You click "don't show again" on a cookie notice, refresh the page, and boom—there it is again. It's like websites have the memory of a goldfish but only for user preferences. Meanwhile, they somehow remember that one embarrassing product you looked at 7 years ago to show in targeted ads. The irony of a site claiming it "doesn't use cookies" while clearly not remembering your preference is just *chef's kiss*. The digital equivalent of telling someone your name and them asking what your name is 30 seconds later.

Ah, the classic "change your Git config and push a bug to production" move. It's like framing your coworker for murder, but in code form. This junior dev just performed the digital equivalent of identity theft by changing their Git config to match their senior's name and email, then pushed broken code straight to prod. Now when the blame command runs, it points to the innocent senior dev who's about to have a very confusing conversation with management. Pure corporate sabotage disguised as a rookie mistake. Diabolical.