Python And Scalability In The Same Sentence

Content Hi Our client needs a Sr. Data Scientist in Hyattsville, MD - Partial Remote. I believe you are qualified for this role. If you are interested please send me your resume and salary. If you are not available please refer someone who can work with us. Work Authorization: US Citizen or Green Card Position type: Full Time Required: - 6 years of applied Data Science experience - 2 years of experience deploying, scaling and continually improving algorithms - Broad industry experience with recommendation - Bachelor's degree in Statistics, Mathematics, Economics. Master's Degree preferred Extra Spices - What you should bring to the table - Expert in recommender systems and personalization algorithms - Above 95th percentile coding ability in Python - Deep understanding of, and experience applying, the following ML concepts: - Collaborative filtering - Linear and scalar algebra - Association rule mining - Ranking algorithms - Advanced regression, classification, clustering, and time series algorithms - Causal inference modeling at scale for algorithm testing and evaluation - Deep learning at scale for NLP - Experience with advanced search concepts using deep learning is a plus! Thanks Regards, ProgrammerHumor io

Content Code Written By A CS 101 Student public int fibonacci (int x) return la else if (x 2) 3 return return fibonacci (x - 1) fibonacci (x - 2): Code Written At A Hackathon public int detFibonacciNumber (int n) case return: case 2: return 1; cases return Case return o return: case return 13; default: 7 good enough for the demo, 101 retard Code Written At A Startup TODO add Javadoc comments gecEloonaccINumber TODO Should we move this to a different 11e? public int getFibonacciNumber (int n) TODO Stack may overflow with recursive implementation, switch over to 77 Iteracion approach at some point? 11 in a 0) TODO Th1s should probably throw an exception. Or maybe just print a log message? recurn -L return 0; else 11 (n as 1) return 1; else over 48 nours stralgnt. return getribonacciNumber n - 1 getribonnaciNumber n Code Written At A Large Company getribonacciNumber 19 a method that, given some index n, returns the nth Fibonacci number. param n The index of the Fibonacci number vou wish to retrieve. Greturn The nth Fibonacci number. public cuscomanceceros cecribonaccaNumber (cuscomanceceros n) FibonacciDataviewBuilder builder FibonacciDataviewBuilderractorv.createribonacciDataviewBuilder new FibonacciDataViewBuilderParams (n, null, null, C ,nall)); 11 (bua-der as Fabonaccabatavaewbulderconstants.ERRORSAIL) 1 throw new ribonaccataviewbullderractoryexceptiong; FibonacciDataview dataview builder.GenerateFibonacciDataview(this; if (dataView FibonacciDataViewConstants.ERROR STATE carow new moonacoroccavrewsereramonuxcerno. return dataview.accessNextribonaccaNumber (null, null, null); Code Written By A Math Ph.D. public int getFibonacciNumber (int n) return (int) divide (subtract (exponentiate (phi (), n), exponentiate (psi () , n)), public double exponentiate double sonne as if (equal lo, zero rerun over )else return multiply a, exponentiate a, subtract b, one))); public double phi () f return davide rada coney, sertradacone , one y, ones, ones, ones, ada (one , one): public double psi 7 return subtract (one (), phi ()); Code Written By Your Cat public static final int UNITE 1: pile 1c stat10 1192 195 NAD public int meow(int KITTENS OF THE WORLD) MEOW (KITTENS OF THE WORLD UNITED ( return KLITENSOFTHEWORLD meegowwwwwwwww ILCOUCOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW return meow (KITTENSOFTHEWORLD - UNITE) ProdrammerHumor.io

Ah, the classic NumPy paradox: np.nan == np.nan returns False . Because apparently even NaN doesn't want to be associated with itself. Just like that one developer who wrote this code and now refuses to acknowledge it in code reviews. The screaming title perfectly captures that moment when you spend 3 hours debugging only to discover your data analysis is failing because Not-a-Number isn't equal to... itself. It's not a bug, it's a feature – said no data scientist ever.

Content LEGION OF DOOM WHEN THEIR YEARS IN MAKING MASTERPLANNED BACKDOOR TO THE JUSTICE LEAGUE SECURITY GETS NOTICED BECAUSE ONE OF BATMAN'S TRAINEES CONNECTION TO THE BATCAVE TOOK .5 MORE SECONDS THAN USUAL You can't do this to me. You know how much I sacrificed?!

Ah, the classic StackOverflow NaN test debate! Someone wrote a beautifully elegant isNaN() function that simply checks if a number isn't equal to itself ( num != num ), which is actually brilliant because that's the only time equality fails in JavaScript/Python. But then some principled developer comes along and declares it "prohibited witchcraft" despite admitting it works perfectly. This is coding purity culture at its finest. "Yes, your three-line solution works flawlessly, but I'm morally obligated to insist you use the official 50-line implementation with seventeen edge cases instead." The real witchcraft is how StackOverflow manages to turn elegant solutions into religious debates since 2009.

Content Other Programmers Python Programmer You should switch to Python bro.