Doing Lethal Code LOL

This is what happens when a Python dev tries to write Rust without actually learning Rust! The code is a horrifying Frankenstein's monster of Python syntax smuggled into Rust—like that .expect("Failed to read line") that would immediately error out since it's attached to a read operation that already completed. And don't get me started on using match with a dot operator right after! The error handling with Ok(num) => num looks legit until you see that bizarre Err(_) => continue syntax that would make the Rust compiler have an existential crisis. It's basically Python wearing a Rust trenchcoat trying to sneak into the memory-safe club.

Content 1 Am Devloper iamdevloper manager: we need to design an admin system for a veterinary centre dev: ok, this is it, remember your training class Dog extends Animal

Content E Problem List E Description D Editorial Solutions Submissions 1614. Maximum Nesting Depth of the Parentheses Easy Topics A Companies 9 Hint A string is a valid parentheses string (denoted VPS) if it meets one of the following: It is an empty string "', or a single character not equal to " (" or ")", It can be written as AB ( A concatenated with B), where A and B are VPS's, or It can be written as (A) , where A is a VPS. We can similarly define the nesting depth depth (S) of any VPS S as follows: depth ("') 0 depth (C) 0, where C is a string with a single character not equal to " (" or ")" depth(A B) max(depth (A) , depth (B)), where A and B are VPS's. depth (" (" ")) 1 depth (A) , where A is a VPS. For example, a, "() ()", and "() (() ())" are VPS's (with nesting depths 0, 1, and 2), and ") (" and "(()" are not VPS's. Given a VPS represented as string S, return the nesting depth of Run g Submit ( Code Solved G Auto public class Solution public int MaxDepth(string 5) E Testcase Test Result Accepted untime: 93 ms Case 1 Case 2 Input " (1 (23) ( (8) 4))1" Output Expected Example 1: Input: s " (1 (23)( (8) 4))1" ProdrammerHumor.io

Content When you type innit init for the 100th time instead of - maybe I'm british

When you discover the ternary operator exists and suddenly feel like you've ascended to a higher plane of programming consciousness. Six lines of pedestrian if-else logic? Nah. One elegant line that makes you feel like you're wearing a tuxedo while coding? Absolutely. Sure, both do the exact same thing, but one makes you look sophisticated at code reviews. The other makes you look like you just finished a "Programming 101" course. We all know which one you're picking. Just wait until you nest three of these bad boys together and your coworkers need a PhD to decipher what you wrote. Peak elegance.

Content rProgrammerHumor 1,111,111 HTML Programmers 3,770 Slacking Off at Work Dedicat programming. Tech or and jokes relating to programmers and I can't believe there are only 127 of US JOINED