Yes I'm Salty

Content People in 1990: Al will probably be very advanced in 30 years The Al they expected: The Al now: dog ProgrammerH

Content When you write over 1000 lines of code and it works perfectly on the first run

Content Signal Mean Zoom factor 13 Magnification BE Magrate 130086 T Toxecret Compiler Execution 010-045 trans for 3x- 169 Arguments go for 1256:benchHost 2456 set VirusMerk678245-treattreatY quarry Xmark for 567 going for send ValueThreat-bendColumn2456Vexzr(Xgf) apart into bendColumnY2459Vexaq(Ygr) infiltrate ToxigenValue7564.8755HostAdressvat superior SecDelay(SintoSecAIntoSect) HastValX send Filter HEX NoStopilel, SecStapVal, SetVal-56) blast file for ValueThreatNoCum(SecVs576-Xihk) rot at 45 Bench"WorryWord (111000) Move 1000, 12876, aaVf stack 2765, into Suikgsh move 1010, 47638, ToxYal (111000)

Content HOW TO WRITE GOOD CODE: START PROJECT. DO THINGS RIGHT OR DO THEM FAST? RIGHT FAST CODE FAST CODE WELL DOES IT WORK YET? NO ALMOST, BUT ITS BECOME A MASS OF KLUDGES AND SPAGHETTI CODE. ARE YOU DONE YET? NO NO, AND THE REQUIREMENTS HAVE CHANGED. THROW IT ALL OUT AND START OVER. GOOD CODE

Ah, the classic "C/C++ is dead" narrative that's been circulating since approximately the Jurassic period. This meme perfectly captures the eternal resilience of C/C++ despite countless obituaries written by trendy language evangelists. Every few years, some shiny new language comes along promising to be the "C++ killer" - yet there's C/C++, smugly posing next to its own grave, refusing to die. Meanwhile, critical infrastructure, operating systems, game engines, and performance-critical applications are still running on these supposedly "ancient" languages. The smirk says it all: "Nice try, Rust/Go/whatever... I've been declared dead more times than a soap opera villain, and I'm still powering the world while you're trying to figure out your package manager."

Content Mom: Tells me to turn off that computer and start studying Me who studies computer programming: