Whynot Mit

Content python ) , lava C RATOR

Content BANK ASKS YOU TO PICK A NEW PASSWORD TWICE A YEAR WITH AT LEAST 1 DIGIT AND 1 SPECIAL CHARACTER STORES PASSWORDS IN PLAINTEXT ingflip.com

Content Writing some code And running it Getting multiple compiler errors Running it again to see if it got fix magically Browse the web for a solution Changing editors to see if the error persists Reading the code you wrote again Finding out the error was a typo

The classic software development saga in three acts: Act 1: "We found a bug! Here's a bizarre workaround that makes no logical sense." Act 2: "After thorough investigation, we've confirmed the bizarre workaround actually works. Please use it." Act 3: "After further investigation, we've determined our workaround does absolutely nothing. We have no idea what's happening." Every developer who's ever shipped code is nodding right now. The correlation-causation fallacy is basically a required skill on résumés at this point.

Starting them young with kernel compilation and chmod permissions. That baby's first words won't be "mama" but "sudo apt-get install". The look of existential dread on the infant's face says it all - forced into the cult of Tux before even learning to crawl. In 18 years, that kid will either be maintaining the Linux kernel or in therapy explaining how they were compiling Gentoo before potty training.

Ah yes, the magnificent tower of Babel that is our "modern digital infrastructure." A massive, precarious stack of systems built on systems, held together by duct tape and prayers. And then there's the r/ProgrammerHumor Redditors, represented by that single, tiny rectangle on the right. Contributing absolutely nothing of structural value while pointing out how ridiculous the whole thing is. The irony of criticizing the very infrastructure they depend on to post their criticisms isn't lost on anyone who's ever restarted a server at 3 AM while muttering "have you tried turning it off and on again?" to themselves.