Oh sure, let me just hardcode EVERY SINGLE YEAR until the heat death of the universe because that's definitely what "future proof" means! Nothing screams sustainable architecture like a 2000-line switch statement checking if it's 2020, 2021, 2022... The comment "add more years before 2028 release" is the cherry on top of this disaster sundae. Imagine being the poor soul who has to maintain this abomination in 2027, frantically adding year 2028 before the whole system implodes. Fun fact: leap year logic is literally just divisible by 4 (except centuries unless divisible by 400), but why use a simple algorithm when you can create a monument to technical debt instead? This is what happens when someone takes "explicit is better than implicit" a bit TOO literally.
Senior Dev Said The Code Needs To Be Future Proof
1 hour ago
22,406 views
0 shares
future-proof-memes, hardcoding-memes, leap-year-memes, bad-code-memes, technical-debt-memes | ProgrammerHumor.io
More Like This
There is no other logical solution.
2 years ago
58.5K views
0 shares
Can Not Implicit Convert
2 years ago
56.6K views
0 shares
The Power Button Pilgrimage
9 months ago
264.9K views
1 shares
Failed my final project.
2 years ago
64.1K views
0 shares
Why Can I Overload โ๏ธ As An Operator But Not ๐?
1 year ago
302.2K views
2 shares
Monitors (affiliate)
Loading more content...
AI
AWS
Agile
Algorithms
Android
Apple
Bash
C++
Csharp