Muscle Memory Over Actual Memory

Content IS THIS A MONAD? 7:02 PM J LOVE) LeSaR Trash cant tell if thats a coding joke or not 7:03 PM J Maybe? 7:03 PM

OH THE SHEER HORROR! That moment when QA swoops in like a detective from a crime drama, pointing at your precious creation with accusatory paws. "We found the issue" they declare, while your soul slowly withers into the void. Your inner voice is literally BEGGING: "Don't say it's my code please" - as if the universe would grant such mercy! Spoiler alert: it's ALWAYS your code. The audacity of hoping it might be someone else's mistake! Your fragile programmer ego is about to be shattered into a million semicolons, and all you can do is pray to the Stack Overflow gods for a quick and painless execution. We've all been there, frantically rehearsing excuses like "it works on my machine" while silently contemplating a new career as a goat farmer.

Someone finally had the courage to say what we've all been thinking. This guy set up a whole "Change My Mind" booth just to drop the truth bomb that Scrum is basically vibe coding with extra steps and a fancy name. The sign reads like a manifesto: "SCRUM is vibe coding with natural intelligence. And the product owner is the prompt engineer." Honestly? Not wrong. You're essentially feeding requirements to developers like prompts to an AI, hoping they interpret your vague user stories correctly, and then acting surprised when sprint planning turns into a philosophical debate about what "done" actually means. The product owner really IS just prompt engineering humans instead of LLMs. "As a user, I want to be able to..." is just a fancier version of "Write me a function that..." The daily standups? That's just checking if the model is still training or if it's stuck in an infinite loop. And retrospectives? Error logs with feelings.

When your Git branch history looks like you're about to hit a sick combo in Guitar Hero, you know you've entered a special circle of version control hell. Those colorful lines crossing over each other in increasingly chaotic patterns? That's what happens when someone discovers merge commits, rebasing, cherry-picking, and force pushing all in the same afternoon without reading the docs first. The real tragedy here is that somewhere in that spaghetti of commits lies actual work that needs to be recovered. Good luck explaining this graph to your team during code review. "Yeah, so I tried to fix a merge conflict and then I panicked and rebased on top of main while simultaneously merging feature branches and... do we have a time machine?" Pro tip: When your commit graph starts looking like a rhythm game, it's time to either git reset --hard and start over, or just burn the whole repo down and pretend it never happened. 🎸

Frontend devs get hugged like the adorable dog for making things pretty. Meanwhile, backend devs are the unappreciated cat sitting alone with a cable in its mouth, desperately trying to get someone to acknowledge that the entire system would collapse without their data connections. Classic workplace dynamics where the visible stuff gets the praise while the critical infrastructure gets ignored until it breaks.

Content IDE: do you trust the authors of the files in this folder Me: made with mematic Well, of course I know him. He's me.