Object-oriented Memes

Posts tagged with Object-oriented

Future Programmer In Training

Future Programmer In Training
Someone put their baby in a Python onesie and honestly? The code checks out. Importing genetics from mom and dad, initializing with "Hello World!", and then entering an infinite loop of sleep, eating, and being awesome. The kid's already mastered the programmer lifestyle better than most of us. That yield Bardak() in the live() method is chef's kiss—because babies literally yield their output everywhere. And the be_awesome() method? Just returns pass because babies don't need to try; they're already awesome by default. Born with better code architecture than half the legacy systems we maintain daily. Ten years from now this kid will look at their baby photos and cringe at the lack of type hints and proper docstrings. But for now, they're living their best life in O(sleep) complexity.

Everything Is An Object

Everything Is An Object
JavaScript devs discovering that literally everything inherits from Object.prototype: strings, numbers, booleans, arrays, functions, even null and undefined (well, almost). You think you're working with primitives? Nope, they get auto-boxed into objects the moment you call a method on them. That innocent "hello".toUpperCase() ? Your string just became a String object behind the scenes. JavaScript's prototype chain is like that friend who insists everyone at the party is related somehow. Try typeof null returning "object" and watch the existential crisis unfold. The language took "everything is an object" from Python and Ruby, then cranked it up to eleven with some delightfully weird type coercion sprinkled on top.

Ignorance Is Bliss

Ignorance Is Bliss
Junior devs just slapping public int x; everywhere and living their best life. Then someone introduces them to encapsulation and suddenly they're writing getters and setters like they just discovered fire. The fancy suit represents that false sense of sophistication you get from following OOP principles—until you realize you've written 20 lines of boilerplate just to access a single integer. You're now "professionally" doing what you used to do in one line, and deep down you're questioning every life choice that led you here. Sometimes the simple solution was fine. But now you're in too deep to go back. Welcome to enterprise development, where we make everything unnecessarily complicated and call it "best practices."

I Feel Betrayed

I Feel Betrayed
Oh, the absolute TREACHERY! You open up Java thinking you're getting some sweet functional programming goodness with lambdas and streams, but SURPRISE—it's still drowning in classes, objects, and inheritance hierarchies like it's 1995. That shocked cat face? That's every developer who thought they could escape OOP hell only to realize that Java's "functional" features are basically just fancy decorations on a very object-oriented cake. You can put lipstick on a pig, but it's still gonna oink in Java bytecode, baby.

We Invented Object Oriented Design To Solve A Problem And Then Invented SQL To Unsolve It Again

We Invented Object Oriented Design To Solve A Problem And Then Invented SQL To Unsolve It Again
The eternal irony of software engineering: we spent decades building beautiful OOP abstractions with encapsulation, inheritance, and polymorphism, only to throw it all away the moment we need to persist data. SQL databases force us to flatten our elegant object hierarchies into normalized tables, then painfully reconstruct them with JOINs. The meme roasts SQL's quirks with surgical precision: case sensitivity that makes you question your life choices, tables that are just "rows of stuff" (goodbye encapsulation), and foreign keys that are basically pointers but worse. The "WHERE LIKE" and "SELECT FROM of it" mockery is chef's kiss—SQL reads like English written by someone who learned programming from a fever dream. Those three CREATE TABLE examples? Pure gold. MySQL's arbitrary constructor order, PostgreSQL declaring types before names (backwards from most languages), and Oracle forgetting strings exist entirely. Each database vendor decided to implement SQL their own special way, creating a fragmentation nightmare. The punchline "Hello I would like INNER JOIN apples please" perfectly captures how unnatural SQL feels compared to object navigation. Instead of customer.orders , you're writing verbose JOIN ceremonies. Object-relational mapping exists precisely because this impedance mismatch is so painful.

Schizophrenia (Object-Oriented Programming)

Schizophrenia (Object-Oriented Programming)
Ah, the classic mental disorder of object-oriented programming! This fake Wikipedia entry brilliantly captures what it feels like to maintain legacy OOP code. You start with a simple class, then suddenly you're creating 17 different inheritance hierarchies, implementing interfaces that don't need to exist, and wondering why your Factory's AbstractSingletonProxyFactoryBean needs its own strategy pattern. And just like schizophrenia has symptoms of disorganized thinking and behavior, your codebase ends up with fragmented responsibilities and voices (comments) from multiple developers arguing about how things should work. The diagnosis? Severe Dependency Injection with a side of Design Pattern Overuse Syndrome.

My Girlfriend Is A Data Model

My Girlfriend Is A Data Model
The smile-to-despair pipeline that hits when your "model" girlfriend isn't the runway type, but a data model in your codebase. In 2020, you're smugly telling everyone about your model girlfriend. By 2026, you've spent six years maintaining that legacy model class with 47 properties, 23 inheritance levels, and enough technical debt to crash the economy. Nothing ages a developer like watching your beautiful abstraction turn into a horrifying monolith that nobody wants to touch but everyone depends on.

The Most Terrifying Tool In Game Development

The Most Terrifying Tool In Game Development
The scariest Halloween costume for GameMaker developers isn't a ghost or zombie—it's the "change instance" tool. That innocent-looking red and blue ball icon circled in red is the digital equivalent of performing heart surgery with your eyes closed. One misclick and your carefully crafted game logic transforms into an unholy abomination. Nothing says "I enjoy chaos" quite like accidentally turning all your player characters into explosive barrels mid-development.

Guess Who's The Impostor

Guess Who's The Impostor
Oh. My. GOD! The C language family drama is giving me LIFE right now! 💅 We've got C# and C++ flanking regular C like it's some kind of programming language family reunion, but honey, one of these is NOT like the others! Plain old C is just SITTING there without any fancy symbols or modern features, practically ANCIENT, while its descendants are flaunting their object-oriented superiority! The audacity! The plain C is clearly the impostor because it doesn't have all those fancy bells and whistles that its children inherited! It's like showing up to a fashion show wearing BEIGE CARGO SHORTS! I can't even!

We Are Not The Same

We Are Not The Same
The ultimate family drama of programming languages! C and C++ are asked if they're friends, and C++ enthusiastically says "Yes" while C firmly says "No." Classic one-sided relationship where C++ was literally built on top of C, inheriting all its features and extending them with object-oriented goodness. Meanwhile, C is that stubborn grandpa who refuses to acknowledge the fancy descendant with all those "unnecessary abstractions." It's like C is still mad that C++ took its syntax, added a bunch of complexity, and then had the audacity to put "++" in its name like it's somehow better. The compatibility is strictly one-directional - just like that one friend who always borrows your stuff but never lets you touch theirs.

The Scariest Programmers

The Scariest Programmers
The programming paradigm hierarchy in its natural habitat! Data-oriented folks stand tall and proud at the top of the food chain. Object-oriented programmers cling desperately to the middle ground, while those return-oriented programmers... well, they're basically just lurking in the shadows waiting to exploit buffer overflows and hijack execution flow. The secret fourth paradigm not pictured: functional programmers who are too busy explaining monads to fit in the frame.

We Are The Same (But Different)

We Are The Same (But Different)
The ultimate polymorphic relationship! Both Perl and C++ are saying they can do one thing in multiple ways, but for completely different reasons. Perl prides itself on the infamous "There's More Than One Way To Do It" philosophy where you can write the same function 47 different ways (and each one looks like your cat walked across the keyboard). Meanwhile, C++ is flexing its polymorphism muscles where you can override methods and have different implementations based on the object type. Both are technically correct, both will give you nightmares during code reviews. The perfect programming language love story doesn't exi—