It works Memes

Posts tagged with It works

Coding Copy Paste 101

Coding Copy Paste 101
OH. MY. GOD. That vintage car with CHANDELIERS for headlights is the MOST DRAMATIC representation of our coding lives! 💅 You spend 6 hours writing a gorgeous algorithm only for it to crash spectacularly, so what do you do? Slap some random Stack Overflow solution on it that has NO BUSINESS working but somehow DOES?! The coding equivalent of attaching fancy chandeliers to a Cadillac and driving away like it's TOTALLY NORMAL. Your code might look ridiculous, but honey, if it passes QA, it SHIPS! Just don't look at the commit history... that's where the REAL horror show lives.

Commented The Code

Commented The Code
When the Senior Dev asks how you fixed that critical bug and all you did was add // TODO: Fix this later and somehow it works now... The look of absolute horror on Tom's face is the perfect representation of senior developers everywhere realizing their codebase is held together by digital duct tape and wishful thinking. Meanwhile, Jerry the intern is just happy the red squiggly lines disappeared from his IDE. The greatest mystery in software development isn't why the bug appeared—it's why it vanished after you acknowledged its existence in a comment. It's like the bug got embarrassed and decided to hide.

It Works, Don't Touch It

It Works, Don't Touch It
A traffic light hanging by a single wire, somehow still functioning despite being completely mangled. Just like that codebase you inherited with 17 nested if-statements, zero comments, and variable names like 'temp1' and 'x42' that miraculously passes all the tests. You don't fix it because you're afraid it might actually stop working. The digital equivalent of "if it's stupid but it works, it's not stupid" – except we all know it's still stupid.

It Works (Somehow)

It Works (Somehow)
The pinnacle of software engineering: a digital clock implementation that would make computer science professors weep. This masterpiece features arrays with missing values, commented out time libraries (because who needs those?), nested loops that would make Dante add another circle to hell, and the iconic comment "//fuck i++" which perfectly captures the developer's spiritual journey. Yet somehow, against all laws of programming and human decency, the output shows a working clock counting from 11:56 to 00:02. It's the coding equivalent of building a rocket with duct tape and prayers—and watching it actually reach orbit.

The Miracle Of Working Tutorial Code

The Miracle Of Working Tutorial Code
The first panel shows the face of resignation we all wear when starting yet another YouTube coding tutorial. You're already mentally preparing for the inevitable "but it works on my machine" moment when your code crashes spectacularly. Then comes the second panel – that moment of pure shock when the code actually runs . No dependency hell. No version mismatches. No mysterious errors from packages that were updated yesterday. Just... working code? It's like finding a unicorn in your backyard. The shock isn't from failure – it's from success against all statistical probability. Your brain simply doesn't know how to process this violation of the universal constants.

Difference Between Programmers And Scientists

Difference Between Programmers And Scientists
Scientists: "Let's understand why our experiment worked so we can replicate it and advance human knowledge." Programmers: "Dear god, nobody commit anything to the repo. I fixed the bug by removing a semicolon and adding it back. I have no idea why it works now, but if anyone breathes on this code it'll probably explode." The true mark of an experienced developer isn't writing perfect code—it's the haunted look they get when something unexpectedly works on the first try.

Just Because You Could Doesn't Mean You Should

Just Because You Could Doesn't Mean You Should
Oh the beautiful abomination of mixing Python with C++ syntax! This code is the programming equivalent of putting pineapple on pizza AND dipping it in chocolate sauce. The madlad imported iostream in Python and then used C++'s cout << syntax inside a Python function. The most cursed part? It actually works! The terminal shows the output "Hello" because Python's flexible import system let this crime against nature run successfully. This is what happens when you know too many languages and decide to play god with syntax. Your code reviewer is probably having a seizure right now.

As Long As It Works

As Long As It Works
DARLING, FEAST YOUR EYES on the masterpiece of mediocrity that is modern development! 💅 That bird drawing starts all proper and dignified, then SPIRALS into absolute CHAOS before somehow—SOMEHOW—still managing to fly! Just like that nightmare codebase you've been nursing along since 2018! Sure, your variables are named 'asdf' and 'temp2Final_REALFINAL', there are 47 nested if-statements, and you've commented "DO NOT TOUCH OR EVERYTHING EXPLODES," but guess what? IT WORKS! And in this economy, that's basically a standing ovation! *dramatically faints onto keyboard*

If It Works Do Not Touch Anything

If It Works Do Not Touch Anything
The eternal standoff between code quality and functionality. The naval officer (senior dev/code reviewer) is horrified by your spaghetti code abomination, but Captain Jack Sparrow (you, the pragmatic dev) has the ultimate comeback: it might be ugly, it might violate every best practice in the book, it might make grown engineers weep... but it does run . Nothing captures the essence of production code quite like this. That monstrosity held together with duct tape and prayers that nobody dares refactor because the last three devs who tried mysteriously disappeared. The code might be an unholy mess, but shipping working garbage beats perfect vaporware every time.

If It Works, It Works

If It Works, It Works
BEHOLD! The architectural MONSTROSITY that is my codebase! That random balcony attached to a brick wall with absolutely NO DOOR to access it? That's the function I wrote at 2am that somehow fixed EVERYTHING. Do I understand why? ABSOLUTELY NOT. Would I rather die than delete it? YOU BET YOUR SEMICOLONS I WOULD! It's like finding a random line of code that prevents your entire application from imploding and just backing away slowly while whispering "nobody touch it." The digital equivalent of a load-bearing poster!

Don't Touch It If It Works

Don't Touch It If It Works
The classic "it works but I have no idea why" scenario. Your code's like that bird—technically flying, but in the most chaotic, physics-defying way possible. After 15 years of coding, I've learned the sacred rule: when something works through pure accident rather than design, you just back away slowly and leave it alone. Ship it. Document it as "proprietary algorithm" and never speak of it again. The right side is what happens when you try to "clean up" that spaghetti code that was somehow working.

The Nine Circles Of Programming Hell

The Nine Circles Of Programming Hell
THE NINE STAGES OF PROGRAMMER EXISTENTIAL CRISIS! 😱 Top row: Your code works and you're feeling like a LITERAL GOD. But wait—as you move right, your understanding plummets into the abyss. "It works and I don't know why" is where the true horror begins! Middle row: ABSOLUTE NIGHTMARE FUEL. Your precious code doesn't work, and your mental state deteriorates from "confident debugger" to "terrified code goblin" faster than you can say "Stack Overflow." Bottom row: The purgatory of "sometimes works." This is where sanity goes to DIE. The skull face says it all—you've transcended into a realm where logic no longer applies and you're just throwing semicolons at the wall hoping something sticks!