Functional programming Memes

Relationship Status: Undefined

5 days ago 119.1K views 0 shares

Functional programmers can't catch a break! Mom asks if he's bringing a girl to Christmas, but all our hero can think about is his Haskell JSON parser that won't compile. The error message shows jsonValue and main are both undefined - classic relationship status for Haskell devs. Meanwhile, he's streaming his coding struggles to 32.6K viewers who are definitely not judging his non-existent dating life. The irony of mastering complex type systems while failing at simple "String → Maybe (String, a)" human relationships is just *chef's kiss*.

Monads: The Ultimate Programming Horror Story

Programming Algorithms Math

14 days ago 177.9K views 1 shares

Monads: The Ultimate Programming Horror Story

Oh. My. GOD. The absolute trauma of trying to understand monads! Even a horror clown is having an existential crisis reading about them! 💀 Monads are basically functional programming's way of saying "Let's take something simple and wrap it in so many layers of abstraction that your brain will literally melt." They're like those Russian nesting dolls except EACH DOLL IS WRITTEN IN HASKELL AND WANTS TO HURT YOU. The face says it all - that moment when you're 47 pages into a monad tutorial and suddenly question all your life choices that led you to this moment of pure intellectual suffering.

The Three Horsemen Of React Hell

React Webdev Javascript Programming Debugging

18 days ago 109.8K views 0 shares

The unholy trinity of React hooks, presented as the Three Musketeers of suffering. useState is clearly the flamboyant leader with the biggest hat—appropriate since it's carrying the weight of your entire application's data. useEffect is that friend who promises to help but creates more problems than it solves, triggering rerenders when you least expect. And useRef? The quiet one silently breaking React's rules by mutating values behind everyone's back. Together they form the perfect storm of "why is my component rendering 47 times?" and "who changed this value when I wasn't looking?" The real joke is that we voluntarily choose this chaos over class components, then spend hours debugging infinite loops while muttering "but the docs said it was simpler this way."

The Parentheses Paradox

Javascript Programming Debugging Frontend

1 month ago 151.1K views 0 shares

Looking at ( ( ) ) => { } ) ( ) ; and wondering how it works is like staring into the abyss of JavaScript's syntax flexibility. It's just nested parentheses, curly braces, and arrows having an existential crisis together. After 15 years of development, I still get cold sweats when I see code like this in production. Somewhere, a senior dev is nodding knowingly while secretly Googling "what does extra parenthesis in arrow function do" in an incognito tab.

When People Encounter Lisp Syntax For The First Time

Programming

1 month ago 151.0K views 0 shares

When People Encounter Lisp Syntax For The First Time

The difference between normal function notation and Lisp's parentheses-everywhere approach is truly office-disrupting material! Top panel: Regular mathematical notation f(x) is perfectly acceptable workplace banter. Bottom panel: Switch to Lisp's (f x) prefix notation and suddenly you're getting reported to HR faster than an unhandled exception. The real tragedy? The poor soul probably just wanted to share their excitement about discovering a language where everything is a list and parentheses are more common than semicolons in JavaScript.

Conditional Baptism: When God Requires Type Safety

Programming Algorithms

2 months ago 174.4K views 2 shares

When functional programming meets religion, you get this masterpiece. Some genius actually implemented conditional baptism in Haskell, complete with type signatures and the Maybe monad to handle the existential uncertainty of your soul's salvation status. The function returns Nothing if you're already baptized (no double-dipping in holy water), and wraps you in a Just if you get the spiritual upgrade. Because apparently, even divine grace needs proper type checking. Next PR: implementing confession as a monadic error handler.

Conditional Baptism

Programming Algorithms

2 months ago 181.2K views 0 shares

Salvation through functional programming! The creator of this masterpiece has blessed us with the holiest of conditional statements—baptism implemented in Haskell. The function returns Maybe Person because even divine intervention respects type safety. If you're already baptized? Return Nothing . Otherwise, you get Just (markBaptized p) . The conditionalBaptize function even uses monadic composition with maybe to handle the uncertainty of salvation. Next time your code needs saving, remember that even spiritual transformations can be expressed as pure functions with no side effects—except eternal life, of course.

Totally Valid F Sharp Name

Programming Csharp Debugging

2 months ago 203.4K views 0 shares

The devil's promise vs. F# reality. Sure, your kid will use "meaningful variable names"—right up until they discover functional programming. Then it's single-letter variables and ASCII art demons summoned directly into your codebase. Nothing says "senior developer" like code that requires an exorcist to debug. That ASCII devil is just the compiler's way of saying "I understand this perfectly, but good luck to the next poor soul who inherits this repo."

I've Seen Them Do It

Programming

2 months ago 172.3K views 0 shares

The ultimate functional programming dad joke has arrived! In OOP, we obsess over objects, but functional programmers just smugly call them "side effects" and try to avoid them like that one relative at Thanksgiving dinner. The punchline works on multiple levels because side effects in functional programming are operations that modify state outside their scope—exactly what pure functional programming tries to eliminate. It's like watching someone build an elaborate sandcastle while promising not to touch the sand. Whoever made this meme definitely mutated some global variables in their day.

Now You Know

Programming Typescript Javascript

3 months ago 229.2K views 0 shares

When someone asks if you know any programming paradigm beyond OOP, and your brain immediately goes to "FU"... which conveniently stands for "Functional Programming." The perfect accidental programmer comeback! After 15 years of watching junior devs make everything an object, I've learned that sometimes the best answer to "how should we architect this?" is indeed just "FU." Pure functions, no side effects, and immutability - it's like telling your stateful code to take a hike.

Beyond Basic Addition

Python Algorithms Programming Debugging

3 months ago 189.9K views 0 shares

That smug face when you implement addition using recursion instead of the + operator because regular math is for peasants. Sure, it'll crash with a stack overflow on large numbers, but that's a problem for future you after your code review. Bonus points for making the function signature look deceptively simple while hiding your algorithmic flexing inside.

Organ Subroutines

Programming Debugging Testing

4 months ago 168.1K views 0 shares

Just like my code, I present a clean interface to the world while hiding the absolute chaos underneath. My organs might claim to be "functional" adults, but peek inside and you'll find a jumbled mess of objects with no documentation and questionable inheritance patterns. The cat's face is basically my expression when someone asks if my codebase follows SOLID principles.

Browse