Corporate logic Memes

From A Multinational Bank Too

7 days ago 216.3K views 0 shares

Nothing screams "enterprise-grade documentation" quite like receiving JSON screenshots pasted into Excel cells. Because why use OpenAPI/Swagger specs, Postman collections, or literally any structured format when you can squint at pixelated text in a spreadsheet? The fact that this is coming from a multinational bank with presumably billions in revenue makes it even more chef's kiss. Someone probably spent hours meticulously screenshotting each endpoint, carefully pasting them into Excel, and thought "yes, this is the professional way." Meanwhile, the developer receiving this masterpiece gets to manually type out every field, guess the data types, and pray they didn't miss anything because zooming into cell B47 isn't helping. The frog's dignified expression perfectly captures the internal screaming while maintaining that corporate professionalism.

Software Companies Made Their Own Bed

AI Programming

11 days ago 244.5K views 0 shares

Nothing says "strategic planning" quite like telling the world your entire workforce is replaceable by AI, then acting shocked when investors realize they don't need to pay top dollar for engineers anymore. Companies spent years hyping up how their AI models would automate coding, convinced VCs to throw money at them, and now they're surprised the market's like "wait, if AI can do it, why are we funding expensive dev teams?" It's the corporate equivalent of shooting yourself in the foot while riding a bike. You spent all that time convincing everyone that programming is easy and anyone can do it with AI assistance, and now your stock price reflects that belief. Turns out when you commoditize your own industry for marketing points, the market takes you seriously. Who could've seen that coming?

OpenAI: 'If We Can't Steal, We Can't Innovate'

AI Programming

11 days ago 316.8K views 0 shares

OpenAI: 'If We Can't Steal, We Can't Innovate'

OpenAI just declared the AI race is "over" if they can't train models on copyrighted content without permission. You know, because apparently innovation dies the moment you have to actually license the data you're using. The bottom panel really nails it—10/10 car thieves would also agree that laws against stealing are terrible for business. Same energy, different industry. It's the corporate equivalent of "Your Honor, if I can't copy my neighbor's homework, how am I supposed to pass the class?" Sure, training AI models on massive datasets is expensive and complicated, but so is respecting intellectual property. Wild concept, I know.

Microsoft: Need More Copilot

Microsoft AI Programming

17 days ago 230.3K views 0 shares

Microsoft really said "you know what developers need? Copilot in literally everything" and just kept going. We've got Copilot in VS Code, Copilot in Windows, Copilot in Edge, Copilot in Office, Copilot in GitHub, and probably Copilot in your toaster by next quarter. The beautiful irony here is that both users AND Microsoft agree on one thing: they hate Copilot. Users hate the AI suggestions cluttering their workflow, the subscription fees, and the fact that it sometimes generates code that looks like it was written by a caffeinated intern at 4 AM. Meanwhile, Microsoft's solution to everyone hating Copilot? Obviously more Copilot. Because if one AI assistant annoying you doesn't work, surely seventeen will do the trick. It's the tech equivalent of "the beatings will continue until morale improves" but make it AI-powered and charge $10/month for it.

I Love Microsoft

Windows AI Microsoft Programming Debugging

23 days ago 300.3K views 0 shares

So you're telling me 30% of your new code is AI-generated and you've got a bug where clicking 'X' spawns Task Manager instances like rabbits? The math checks out. Nothing says "cutting-edge AI-powered development" quite like a basic UI interaction causing process duplication. Really makes you wonder what that 30% of AI code is doing—probably writing infinite loops and feeling proud about it. The corporate irony here is chef's kiss: bragging about AI productivity while shipping bugs that would make a junior dev blush. Sure, AI can write code faster, but apparently nobody told it about the whole "quality assurance" thing. At this rate, Windows 12 will just be a chatbot apologizing for bugs in real-time.

Catch 22

Programming

29 days ago 209.2K views 0 shares

Software companies really out here asking you to stop pirating their $600 software while simultaneously demanding you buy it at full price. Like, my guy, if I had $600 lying around, I wouldn't be pirating it in the first place. The circular logic is chef's kiss. It's giving "entry-level position requiring 5 years of experience" energy. Fun fact: Studies have shown that software pirates often become paying customers once they can actually afford it. Turns out, people who learned Photoshop through "alternative means" in college tend to push for their companies to buy legitimate licenses later. But sure, keep yelling at broke students instead of offering reasonable pricing tiers.

Nvidia To Bring Back The GeForce RTX 3060 To Help Tackle Current-Gen GPU & Memory Shortages

Hardware AI Programming

1 month ago 226.2K views 0 shares

Nvidia To Bring Back The GeForce RTX 3060 To Help Tackle Current-Gen GPU & Memory Shortages

So Nvidia's solution to the AI-driven GPU shortage is bringing back the RTX 3060... but here's the kicker: they're conveniently bringing back the gimped 12GB version instead of something actually useful. It's like your manager saying "we're addressing the workload crisis" and then hiring an intern who can only work Tuesdays. The 12GB RTX 3060 was already the budget option that got nerfed to prevent crypto mining, and now it's being resurrected as the hero we supposedly need? Meanwhile, everyone running LLMs locally is sitting there needing 24GB+ VRAM minimum. The meme format captures the corporate gaslighting perfectly. Nvidia's out here acting like they're doing us a favor while the AI bros are burning through 80GB A100s like they're Tic Tacs. Sure, bring back a card from 2021 with barely enough memory to run a decent Stable Diffusion model. That'll fix everything. Classic Nvidia move: create artificial scarcity, charge premium prices, then "solve" the problem with yesterday's hardware at today's prices.

Return To Office Or PIP: The Corporate Clown Show

Programming Devops

3 months ago 198.5K views 0 shares

Return To Office Or PIP: The Corporate Clown Show

First, companies complain about dev shortages. Then they admit it's actually good devs they can't find. Next revelation? Good devs exist but won't commute to their sad little cubicle farms. So what's the brilliant corporate solution? Hire offshore talent! The mental gymnastics here deserve a gold medal. Instead of creating remote-friendly environments or—heaven forbid—competitive compensation, companies would rather deal with time zone chaos and communication barriers than let their precious ping-pong tables gather dust. Remember kids, nothing says "we value talent" like threatening PIP (Performance Improvement Plans) when someone doesn't want to spend 2 hours daily in traffic just to Slack message the person sitting 6 feet away.

Just Improve Your Resume Bro

Programming Webdev

3 months ago 255.6K views 0 shares

The classic tech industry paradox in four panels. Companies scream about dev shortages while rejecting perfectly good candidates. Meanwhile, entry-level devs can't even get interviews because they need 5 years of experience in a 2-year-old framework and a PhD in quantum computing to qualify for a junior position. The hiring manager's solution? Violence, apparently. Much easier than fixing broken ATS systems that filter out qualified candidates or reconsidering those "entry-level" job descriptions requiring 10 years of experience.

Adding More Developers Won't Fix A Stuck Project

Programming Devops Agile Debugging

9 months ago 255.2K views 1 shares

Adding More Developers Won't Fix A Stuck Project

Adding more developers to a stuck project is like adding more people to drive a cart stuck in mud. The obvious solution? More horsepower to pull it out. The corporate solution? Add more drivers who'll just sit there smoking while the same horse struggles. Next sprint planning meeting, I'll just bring this picture instead of speaking. Saves everyone 45 minutes.

It Must Cost Money To Be Secure

Security Vim Programming Python Linux

9 months ago 366.3K views 0 shares

Ah, corporate security logic at its finest! Some poor soul clicks a sketchy email attachment, and suddenly management's brilliant security strategy is "if it's free, it's a threat." Imagine telling developers to uninstall Python, Vim, and 7zip because they didn't come with an invoice. Next they'll be requiring receipts for your keyboard shortcuts. The real security threat isn't free software—it's the executive who thinks obscure paid software with three users worldwide is inherently secure because it cost exactly one corporate credit card approval. Meanwhile, the hacker who sent that email is probably using those same "insecure" free tools to plan their next attack. The irony would be delicious if it weren't so painful.

Weird How That Works

Programming Devops Agile Debugging Testing

10 months ago 231.2K views 0 shares

The eternal paradox of software development budgets! Companies will pinch pennies when it comes to investing in proper architecture, clean code, or adequate testing time... but then magically find a mountain of cash when it's time to rewrite the entire codebase because the technical debt finally collapsed like a house of cards. It's the corporate equivalent of refusing to pay for an oil change but happily buying a new engine when the old one seizes up. Technical debt interest rates are brutal , folks!

Browse