Git Blame

Content rtechnology Posted by utenbits 11h GitHub to replace "master" with alternative term to avoid slavery references 143 212 I'M HELPING

Content Create a 'squasht comedi Greate new local repo git init commit (to be aulosquel git comit -squast Clone existing repo git clone url List all local branches git branch Get (pull) changes git pult Print name of curent bald Get changes without merging S oft rev-parse -47 S git fetch remotes branch HEAD Upload (push) changes Create new branch andre S git push git checkout d de Upload new branch to origin remote Create new branch utili git push -u origin branch current one List files to be commited git branch delle git status. Margo other bencher Show unstaged changes git diff Pertorm Interactive mo Show changes using file diff tool git difftool Pertorm interactive rabat Show staged changes with autosquash git diff -staged Commit (permanently record) sotherbranch staged changes Rename a branch "git commit -m "message" (to be autosquashed) Gott a trupt commit for alter commit erdrea laed, Delete a local brandh, I git commit anfixup shal? git branch soll

BEHOLD! The world's most dramatic trademark dispute! AMD's ROCm software was once proudly "Radeon Open Compute platform" until the trademark police kicked down their door and said "YOU CAN'T SIT WITH US!" Now it's just... letters. Not an acronym. Just vibes. The ultimate corporate walk of shame where they had to [REDACT] their own name but keep using it anyway. It's like naming your child after your ex and then pretending the name doesn't actually mean anything when they ask. Pure tech industry DRAMA!

Content SOMEONE INSULTS YOUR MOTHER, WIFEAND CHILDREN SOMEONE POINTS OUTONE THING THAT HE DOESNT LIKE ABOUT LINUX imaflip.com

Content rAskReddit Posted by uworldtraveler100 10h What technology are you shocked has not advanced yet? 26.8k J 14.6k Share Award BEST COMMENTS RegulatoryCapture 4h A 1 Award The legal code. Computer programmers have come up with beautiful collab- orative change tracking systems (like git) that let you easily make changes to a huge base of code, track who changed what, submit and resolve conflicting versions of updates, etc. But when we pass a new bill that replaces or modifies an old law, it is always some 300 page document with pages of "Subsection F Paragraph 3 will be modified to read 'XYZ' Why not put the laws into a git repository and make it easy for bills to just modify the existing history to say what you want it to say? And why not have the transparency to see exactly what changes and WHO implemented that change? Want to slip some pork for your district into an unrelated bill? Well, that edit is going to have your name on it. Of course it will never happen. Reply 4 928 J imtn 1h Who the heck wrote this ridiculous bill? git blame Ah. I did. 217

Content When everybody blames you and your software. But it ends up being a network issue: