I Just Wanted To Change A Button Color

Content QuickChange919 3 hr ago "these big companies dont have that much of our data", Microsoft legit needing a whole nuclear power plant to deal with it all 16 781 pedrocrb 3 hr ago Its probably 90 just to deal with nodemodules 4 65

The JavaScript pushState() function has an unused parameter that literally does nothing but can't be removed because... backward compatibility! 🤦‍♂️ It's like that one useless function parameter that's been in your codebase for 5 years and everyone's too scared to remove it because "something might break." The documentation even admits it with a straight face: "This parameter exists for historical reasons, and cannot be omitted." The red scribbles perfectly capture every developer's reaction: "??? WTF" - which is basically the official technical term for legacy code maintenance.

Content Question: How to round 2 decimal. places in JavaScrint mana memotion ormanipulation ot any kind for performance reasons. but there nk it should de claritied here that the goal ot these efforts is not to completely eliminate the inherent rounding errors caused by the floating point data type, as that will never be Person A cossible vathout switching to a cata inp that is acmall storing the value as a base cecimal. The goal realy shoud be to pus: PerSOM B ' the edge as possible. so that you oroducino the buo. The moment your value hits the absolute edge, where simply invoking the value would cause us to produce the bug, either before or after you've manipulated it. there's nothing more you could do to alleviate that or eyample. r vou instantiate the value 49 g93939339993s, us wall immed ate y round it to if the value is a text tvne' 0.015. Therefore if you passed that value to any of these functions, you are actually passing 0.015. Aithal ooint you coulont even convert to swine they and then manloulate , the value would nave be instantiated as a string from the start for that to work. The goal, and only reasonable parseFloat 123.456 ).toFixed 2): edge where either the starting value, or resulting value would produce the bug simply by being If the value is a number: always store the value as a string and use a combination of string manipulation and integer basec var numb 123.23454; numb numb. toFixed 2: Arer running torough various rerations of all the poseik o wave so achieve true acrurate decimal precision. It can be easily polyfilled as shown here: https:developer.mozilla.orgen- remaining lE users then again maybe we should stop doing that). a simple dron in solition that pravices armurare reginal rrrrira rrors and coiling US. U UPDAS' As sergey noted in the comments. there is a limitation to this or any method that's worth pointing out. In the case of numbers like 0.014999999999999898, you will still toating hint value ciorace here is no math or oiner solution that can he annlier to account sot that, as the value itself is immediately evaluated as 0.015. You can confirm this by simoly invoking that value ov selt in the console. Due to this imitation. it would not even be poss ole to use strinc manipulation to reduce this value, as its string representation is simply "0.015". Any solution to consideration that would need to be taken into account on a case by case basis to determine the 08.10.2070 PDATE Per Amrs comment top coil and toor functions will produce undesired More This issue also reypale that while the ceil and door functions stil roguire the annication o the Number EPSILON adiusiment. they do oroduce undesirable results when apolied to a value for the output (p). For examole, ceil 17.1, 5) should retum 17.1 in relation to exoected "ceil" function penavior when apoleo to whole numbers in mathematics, vere a decima olaces atte "'" are assumed to be 0. To correct for this, I've added an additional function check to identify if the if(Number. isInteger undefined) return syptor vasut ass ThiS GROunds sunctioniness

Content front end back end

The progression from "HTML is basic makeup" to "CSS adds some color" is fine, but then suddenly HTTP is portrayed as rocket science? Give me a break. The real punchline is creating an entire JavaScript framework because apparently making a GET request is too complicated. This is why we have 47 versions of React knockoffs and your website takes 15 seconds to load a button. Frontend development in 2024: where we solve problems we created ourselves with solutions that create more problems.

Oh. My. GOD. The eternal developer drama in four panels! 😒 Panel 1-3: Developer with dead-inside eyes listening to someone complain about their favorite programming language. Panel 4: ABSOLUTE RAGE EXPLOSION when they hear "then don't use it" - because HOW DARE YOU suggest a simple solution when I've committed my entire personality to hating this language?! The audacity! The betrayal! I didn't spend 7 years crafting elaborate rants about PHP/JavaScript/Python just to be told I could simply... not use it? *faints dramatically*