Is Something Wrong With My CPU?

OH. MY. GOD. The sheer EXISTENTIAL CRISIS of staring at an M.2 SSD and its socket like they're written in hieroglyphics! That moment when you've spent $200 on fancy storage and now you're just sitting there, surrounded by cables, questioning every life decision that led you to this point. The socket is RIGHT THERE, the disk is RIGHT THERE, yet somehow they might as well be quantum particles existing in different dimensions! And those tiny pins?! One wrong move and you've just created the world's most expensive paperweight! Hardware upgrades - where confidence goes to DIE! 💀

Remember when NVIDIA promised us RTX would revolutionize gaming? Fast forward to reality where we've gone from "RTX Hair" that just makes characters look like they haven't showered in weeks to "HairWorks" that completely overhauls physics but turns your $3000 GPU into a space heater. Meanwhile, the doge meme evolved from normal to buff while our framerates went from 60 to slideshow. Graphics cards marketing in a nutshell: "Sure, your game runs at 3 FPS now, but look at those gloriously realistic individual strands of greasy hair!"

Chrome tabs and AI models - the two horsemen of RAM apocalypse. ChatGPT casually using 13.8 GB of memory like it's nothing, while your computer quietly weeps. Remember when we thought 4GB was excessive? Now our browsers are out here consuming memory like tech bros at an all-you-can-eat buffet. Your PC isn't running an AI assistant - it's financing its therapy sessions.

Ah, the classic "technically correct but practically useless" graph! The Y-axis shows a tiny range from 3.18 to 3.32 GHz, making that 0.1 GHz difference (3.2 → 3.3) look like Moore's Law on steroids. Marketing departments be like: "BEHOLD OUR REVOLUTIONARY 3.1% SPEED INCREASE!" while charging you 50% more for your next CPU. It's the hardware equivalent of adding a single line break to your code and claiming you've refactored the entire codebase. The graph scaling is so manipulative it should come with its own LinkedIn profile specializing in "data visualization enhancement."

Top panel: Guy literally crying over his RTX 4090 because it can't push enough frames on his ultra-expensive monitor. Meanwhile, bottom panel: Chad with a 3060 Ti just vibing with his 1080p setup that'll run Doom Eternal at max settings until the heat death of the universe. The real irony? Top guy probably only plays Valorant and checks email. Bottom guy is just happy his PC boots without catching fire.

The classic bait-and-switch from Valve! Everyone thought the Steam Deck competitor "GabeCube" (named after Gabe Newell, Valve's founder) would be reasonably priced at $500-600, competing with consoles like PlayStation and Xbox. But nope! Valve decided they're "competing with PC" instead – which is corporate speak for "we're charging you $1000+ for this tiny box." It's like going to buy a Honda and the salesman says "Actually, we compete with SpaceX." The PC gaming tax strikes again – miniaturization doesn't come cheap, folks!