Some Men Want To Watch The World Burn

The security admin proudly sets up branch protection requiring admin approval for all code changes. Meanwhile, the intern is confused about needing a +1 approval while the senior dev is like "lgtm, ship it" despite the code clearly containing an API key hardcoded in plain text with debugging logs printing credentials. Security theater at its finest - the branch is protected but the data sure isn't.

A dollar bill with "IN GOD WE TRUST" modified to read "IN GIT WE TRUST." Because let's face it, version control is the only thing standing between us and complete chaos. Your code might be worthless, but at least Git remembers what it looked like when it actually worked three commits ago. The true religion of developers isn't coffee or Stack Overflow—it's the ability to blame someone else via git blame.

Companies pretending they're protecting "intellectual property" when the real reason they won't open source their code is because it's a horrifying mess of spaghetti logic, hardcoded credentials, and comments like "// TODO: fix this before demo (2018)". The corporate PR spin: "Our proprietary algorithms give us competitive advantage!" The actual codebase: 47 nested if-statements and a function called hack_it_until_it_works() that somehow powers the entire billing system.

GitHub is all professional and polished, looking like it just stepped out of a corporate photoshoot. StackOverflow is giving you that knowing smirk—it's seen some things, answered some questions, probably roasted a few newbies who didn't format their code properly. Then there's your actual code, which looks like it was drawn by someone having a fever dream during a hackathon at 4 AM. The reality is that your GitHub repos look pristine with their README files and organized commits, while StackOverflow solutions seem elegant and well-thought-out. But when you actually open your codebase? It's a Frankenstein's monster of copy-pasted snippets, TODO comments from 2019, and functions named "doTheThing2_FINAL_actuallyFinal_v3". The gap between what your code looks like in your head versus what it actually is could fit the entire JavaScript ecosystem in it.

Someone opened a GitHub issue for Arch Linux's installer with the title "I lost my virginity and now Arch won't boot #4269" and honestly, that's the most Arch Linux thing ever. The distro is so notoriously finicky that even the slightest change to your system—apparently including life milestones—can break your boot sequence. The fact that there are 169 open issues just confirms what we all suspected: using Arch is basically volunteering for a part-time job as your own IT department.

The eternal struggle of naming Git commits... One minute you're coding like a genius, the next you're staring at the terminal like it's the Da Vinci Code. Your brain suddenly forgets all vocabulary except "fix stuff" and "update things." And let's be honest, half our commit history reads like desperate prayers: "please_work_now," "final_fix_i_swear," "kill_me." The beautiful irony is we spend hours crafting elegant code but can't be bothered to document what the hell we actually changed. Future you will definitely understand what "asdfghjkl" meant six months from now!