Pull "Request"

Ah, the Stockholm subway map - the perfect visual metaphor for what happens when you try to merge to main after just 4 hours of Git experience. That tangled mess of colored lines intersecting in chaotic ways? That's your branch history after you've discovered git rebase , git cherry-pick , and the dreaded git push --force all in the same afternoon. Trust me, kid. We've all been there. Your repo probably looks like someone dropped spaghetti on a circuit board. Just wait until you discover merge conflicts - that's when you'll really need this map to find the nearest bar.

Treating yourself like a software project is peak developer energy. While everyone else is promising to hit the gym, this guy's posting a changelog for himself like he just pushed to production. The real joke is thinking any of those bugs will actually get fixed before next December's emergency hotfix. At least he didn't label it "various performance improvements" which we all know means "I broke something but can't figure out what."

The AUDACITY of these people! Your coworkers are just casually hitting that AI slop pull request button like it's a free candy dispenser while you're over here DYING inside! 😤 They're submitting code that was clearly written by ChatGPT's questionable cousin, with variable names like 'finalFinalActuallyFinalV2' and functions that look like they were written during a fever dream. But the worst part? You can't PROVE it! You're just sitting there, eye twitching, watching your git history become a graveyard of AI-generated monstrosities while management praises them for their "productivity." The betrayal! The horror! The absolute DRAMA of modern development!

Grammar corrections feel like getting shot in the face with a laser gun. Code corrections? That's just free QA. Developers would rather have their entire codebase criticized than deal with someone pointing out they used "your" instead of "you're" in the documentation. Priorities, I guess.

The difference between how versioning should work and how it actually works in some codebases. According to semantic versioning, you increment the major version (like 1.0 to 2.0) when you make changes that break backward compatibility. But then there's that one developer who breaks something with literally every commit and somehow still has a job. Their changelog probably just reads "Fixed stuff, broke other stuff" for every release. It's basically the software development equivalent of playing Russian roulette with a fully loaded gun.

Someone just discovered that Git's developers have a bizarre obsession with bathroom fixtures. The "porcelain" commands are the clean, user-friendly ones you're supposed to touch, while the "plumbing" commands work behind the scenes where things get messy. This StackOverflow gem has been viewed 143k times because apparently thousands of developers were silently wondering why their version control system was named after toilet parts. Imagine trying to explain to non-tech people: "Yeah, I'm having issues with Git porcelain today" and watching their concerned faces. The real question is what other bathroom-inspired terminology we're missing. Git flush? Git unclog? The possibilities are terrifyingly endless.